ERIC Number: ED664088
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2024
Pages: 124
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: 979-8-3463-8757-2
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
How Do Comprehenders Obtain Non-Veridical Understanding of Structure? An Examination of Mechanistic Accounts
Douglas John Getty
ProQuest LLC, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh
Given that both spoken and written language are subject to corruption from speech errors, disfluencies, and environmental noise, successful language comprehension sometimes requires deriving a non-veridical understanding of the linguistic input. Recent work has demonstrated that these non-veridical understandings are not merely semantic, but that, when licensed, these non-veridical understandings are also syntactic. For example, implausible dative sentences like "The man gave the apple the child" may be re-interpreted as the man gave the apple to the child. Several recent studies have found, using an implicit measure of structural understanding (structural priming), that comprehenders tend to obtain an understanding of these implausible datives more in line with the re-interpreted form. Across studies, I used structural priming to investigate two possible mechanistic explanations for how this may occur: plausibility-based syntactic prediction, and post-hoc revision. In Study 1 and 2, I find evidence that comprehenders can modify their structural representation of implausible datives on the basis of post-hoc visual context, but not from visual context accessible during online prediction. In Study 3, I find that comprehenders do not obtain non-veridical structural understanding when sentence interruptions ought to entrench structural predictions. Further, this study shows that comprehenders do indeed gain a structural representation that is more like the non-veridical alternative structure than the veridical structure. Study 4 is a novel re-analysis of existing studies, where I find that comprehenders are structurally primed more from the non-veridical interpreted structure than the veridical structure. Altogether, these results support a world where non-veridical understanding of structure is better explained by a post-hoc revision mechanism rather than an online prediction mechanism. These findings are discussed in the context of higher-level accounts of non-veridical understanding, frameworks of communication in dialogue, and figurative language comprehension. [The dissertation citations contained here are published with the permission of ProQuest LLC. Further reproduction is prohibited without permission. Copies of dissertations may be obtained by Telephone (800) 1-800-521-0600. Web page: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2222/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml.]
ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, P.O. Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106. Tel: 800-521-0600; Web site: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2222/en-US/products/dissertations/individuals.shtml
Publication Type: Dissertations/Theses - Doctoral Dissertations
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A