Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 2 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 6 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 17 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 49 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 95 |
Evaluative Thinking | 95 |
Foreign Countries | 26 |
College Students | 16 |
Decision Making | 16 |
Cognitive Processes | 15 |
Evaluation Methods | 14 |
Age Differences | 13 |
Higher Education | 11 |
Student Attitudes | 11 |
Adults | 10 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Cohen, Robert | 2 |
Janes, Joseph W. | 2 |
Koriat, Asher | 2 |
Ray, Glen E. | 2 |
Scholnick, Ellin Kofsky | 2 |
von Helversen, Bettina | 2 |
Ackerman, Rakefet | 1 |
Aguert, Marc | 1 |
Alderson, J. Charles | 1 |
Aljughaiman, Abdullah M. | 1 |
Ameel, Eef | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 15 |
Postsecondary Education | 12 |
Elementary Education | 3 |
Secondary Education | 3 |
Grade 5 | 2 |
Early Childhood Education | 1 |
Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Practitioners | 4 |
Teachers | 4 |
Administrators | 2 |
Researchers | 1 |
Location
United Kingdom | 6 |
Australia | 4 |
Taiwan | 3 |
United Kingdom (England) | 3 |
Asia | 2 |
Netherlands | 2 |
Spain | 2 |
Switzerland | 2 |
United States | 2 |
Belgium | 1 |
Brazil | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills | 1 |
Peabody Picture Vocabulary… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Macmillan, Neil A.; Rotello, Caren M. – Psychological Review, 2006
B. B. Murdock (2006; see record 2006-08257-009) has interpreted remember-know data within a decision space defined by item and associative information, the fundamental variables in his general recognition memory model TODAM (B. B. Murdock, 1982). He has related parameters of this extended model to stimulus characteristics for several classic…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Stimuli, Predictor Variables, Decision Making

McDonald, John; And Others – Cognition, 1996
Introduced the hypothesis-assessment model, claiming that the strength of inductive argument is determined by the same factors that affect hypothesis plausibility in the everyday social milieu. Describes experiments conducted to assess argument strength. Discusses strengths and limitations of the proposed hypothesis-assessment model. (MOK)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluative Thinking, Hypothesis Testing, Induction

Mellers, Barbara A.; Biagini, Karen – Psychological Review, 1994
A contrast weighting approach is explored for choice situations where the similarity of levels along one dimension enhances the weight of the other dimension. The contrast-weighting theory is applied to different data sets in which subjects make choices between multiattribute options. (SLD)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Contrast, Decision Making, Evaluative Thinking
Glicksohn, Joseph; Naor-Ziv, Revital; Leshem, Rotem – Cognition, 2007
A decade ago, Bechara et al. [Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. "Cognition, 50," 7-15] published a paper in Cognition, introducing a Gambling Task which was designed to mimic everyday decision-making. Since then, the task has been…
Descriptors: Substance Abuse, Self Destructive Behavior, Behavior Disorders, Decision Making

Vonk, Roos; Heiser, Willem J. – Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1991
A study involving 11 male and 11 female inhabitants of Leiden (Netherlands) tested the hypothesis that a subject's judgments of the personality of unfamiliar target persons correspond better with the subject's Implicit Personality Theory than do judgments of the personality of familiar persons. The results confirm the hypothesis. (TJH)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluative Thinking, Familiarity, Foreign Countries

Birnbaum, Michael H.; Jou, Jr-Wen – Cognitive Psychology, 1990
Through an experiment with 30 college students, a theory was developed to describe response times and ratings of the difference of stimuli. The model was applied in ratings of the likableness of persons by 22 other college students. A theory of comparative response times and difference judgments is discussed. (SLD)
Descriptors: College Students, Comparative Analysis, Differences, Evaluative Thinking
Chambers, John R.; Windschitl, Paul D. – Psychological Bulletin, 2004
Biases in social comparative judgments, such as those illustrated by above-average and comparative-optimism effects, are often regarded as products of motivated reasoning (e.g., self-enhancement). These effects, however, can also be produced by information-processing limitations or aspects of judgment processes that are not necessarily biased by…
Descriptors: Motivation, Information Processing, Evaluative Thinking, Value Judgment
Janes, Joseph W. – Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting, 1993
Examines the statistical distribution of relevance judgments by reviewing and comparing the results of several studies over the last three decades. A characteristic distribution is examined, and a hypothesis is offered to explain it based on human judging characteristics and the nature of relevance experimentation. (Contains 13 references.) (LRW)
Descriptors: Charts, Comparative Analysis, Evaluative Thinking, Graphs

Horton, Nicole K.; Ray, Glen E.; Cohen, Robert – Child Study Journal, 2001
Examined second-, third-, fifth-, and sixth-graders' evaluations of parent-child inductive discipline situations. Found that for physical transgressions, victim-oriented induction was evaluated as more appropriate and fair than parent-oriented induction. Younger children evaluated parent-oriented induction as more appropriate than older children.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Childhood Attitudes, Children, Comparative Analysis

Bussey, Kay – Child Development, 1999
Investigated 4-, 8-, and 11-year-olds' ability to categorize intentionally false and true statements as lies and truths. Found that older children were more likely to categorize false statements as lies and true statements as truths than were 4-year-olds. Antisocial lies were rated as most serious, and "white lies" as least serious.…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Children, Classification, Cognitive Development
Manaster, Guy J.; Friedman, S. Thomas – Journal of College Student Personnel, 1976
Attitudes of students at an English university toward 45 campus organizations, movements, and agencies are examined. Findings suggest a positive view of campus life in general and existence of a clear, straightforward cognitive process in evaluating organizations. Comparisons are made with a major university in the United States. (Author)
Descriptors: College Environment, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Evaluative Thinking

Luborsky, Lester; And Others – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1982
Tested whether independent judges could recognize three different manual-guided psychotherapies, drug counseling, supportive-expressive psychotherapy, and cognitive-behavioral using a special rating form containing scales for the characteristic aspects of each type. Results indicated that manual-guided therapies can be reliably recognized.…
Descriptors: Adults, Comparative Analysis, Counseling Techniques, Drug Abuse
Alderson, J. Charles – 1990
Language testing is an area of applied linguistics that combines the exercise of professional judgment about language, learning, and the nature of the achievement of language learning with empirical data about student performance and, by inference, their abilities. The relationship between judgments and empirical data in language testing is…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Difficulty Level, Evaluative Thinking, Item Analysis
Johnson, Linda L. – 1978
Prestige-suggestion, the effect that the prestige or reputation of a source has on a receiver, is the subject of this paper. Three research studies which have been done recently by researchers in reading are reported. These studies asked the following questions: If consumers evaluate products by means of reading store advertisements, will they be…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods, Evaluative Thinking
Paulston, Rolland G. – 1979
Theories or explanations of educational evaluation are discussed and categorized under two broad methodological headings, the objectivist and subjectivist epistemological orientations. They can be seen as potentially complementary empirical approaches that offer evaluators two methodological orientations to assess educational-reform outcomes.…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Educational Assessment, Educational Change, Educational Policy