Descriptor
Source
Currents | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Guides - Non-Classroom | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Administrators | 3 |
Practitioners | 3 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Dunn, John A., Jr.; Hutten, Leah R. – Currents, 1984
Techniques used at Tufts University to evaluate its achievement and goals for institutional development efforts before beginning a new program are outlined, including identifying and assessing competition, finding measures of support volume and importance to the institution, and comparing one's own institution with others in actual and potential…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Competition, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Reitan, Cheryl – Currents, 1998
Colleges and universities should critically review their publications periodically to save money and also as a way to present a more cohesive institutional identity. Ten recommendations are made for conducting a productive publications audit; they include choosing an evaluation method, selecting participants, making the experience pleasant, and…
Descriptors: College Administration, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Simpson, Kristen – Currents, 1998
In an interview, the managing editor of a major publication in higher education explains what the media want to know about such issues as college and program rankings, affirmative action, college costs, crime on campus, and how colleges can communicate their positions better, make their messages more coherent, and influence the opinions of both…
Descriptors: Affirmative Action, College Environment, Comparative Analysis, Crime
Hay, Tina M. – Currents, 1992
Although higher education institutions dislike rankings published in the mass media, they like the attention the rankings create and prefer to be included rather than excluded. Common criticisms of the methodology include emphasis on inappropriate criteria, unfair comparison of private and public institutions, faulty assumptions, inaccurate data,…
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education, Mass Media