Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 4 |
Descriptor
Comparative Analysis | 6 |
Predictive Validity | 6 |
Elementary School Students | 4 |
Grade 2 | 4 |
Grade 1 | 3 |
Reading Tests | 3 |
Scores | 3 |
Screening Tests | 3 |
Accuracy | 2 |
Correlation | 2 |
Cutting Scores | 2 |
More ▼ |
Source
Educational and Psychological… | 1 |
Gifted Child Quarterly | 1 |
Journal of Psychoeducational… | 1 |
Journal of School Psychology | 1 |
Regional Educational… | 1 |
School Psychology Review | 1 |
Author
Petscher, Yaacov | 2 |
Checca, C. Jason | 1 |
Gambrell, James L. | 1 |
Giessman, Jacob A. | 1 |
Hintze, John M. | 1 |
Kim, Young-Suk | 1 |
Koon, Sharon | 1 |
Pomplun, Mark | 1 |
Silberglitt, Benjamin | 1 |
Stebbins, Molly S. | 1 |
Tung, Catherine Y. | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 5 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Education Level
Grade 2 | 6 |
Grade 1 | 5 |
Elementary Education | 4 |
Grade 3 | 3 |
Early Childhood Education | 2 |
Kindergarten | 2 |
Primary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
California | 1 |
Florida | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Cognitive Abilities Test | 1 |
Dynamic Indicators of Basic… | 1 |
Minnesota Comprehensive… | 1 |
Stanford Achievement Tests | 1 |
Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Koon, Sharon; Petscher, Yaacov – Regional Educational Laboratory Southeast, 2015
The purpose of this report was to explicate the use of logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analysis in the development of early warning systems. It was motivated by state education leaders' interest in maintaining high classification accuracy while simultaneously improving practitioner understanding of the rules by…
Descriptors: Classification, Regression (Statistics), Models, At Risk Students
Vanderwood, Michael L.; Tung, Catherine Y.; Checca, C. Jason – Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 2014
The predictive validity and accuracy of an oral reading fluency (ORF) measure for a statewide assessment in English language arts was examined for second-grade native English speakers (NESs) and English learners (ELs) with varying levels of English proficiency. In addition to comparing ELs with native English speakers, the impact of English…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, Accuracy, Oral Reading, Reading Fluency
Giessman, Jacob A.; Gambrell, James L.; Stebbins, Molly S. – Gifted Child Quarterly, 2013
The Naglieri Nonverbal Ability Test, Second Edition (NNAT2), is used widely to screen students for possible inclusion in talent development programs. The NNAT2 claims to provide a more culturally neutral evaluation of general ability than tests such as Form 6 of the Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT6), which has Verbal and Quantitative batteries in…
Descriptors: Gifted, Identification, Cognitive Ability, Intelligence
Petscher, Yaacov; Kim, Young-Suk – Journal of School Psychology, 2011
This study used data from the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS; Good & Kaminski, 2002) oral reading fluency (ORF) probes to examine variation among different ORF score types (i.e., the median of three passages, the mean of all three passages, the mean of passages 2 and 3, and the score from passage 3) in predicting…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Fluency, Predictive Validity, Emergent Literacy
The Differential Predictive Validity of the Initial Skills Analysis: Reading Screening Tests for K-3
Pomplun, Mark – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2004
The present study investigated the differential predictive validity of the Initial Skills Analysis. In the fall, these reading screening tests were administered to students in Grades K to 3. In the spring, a series of reading outcomes tests were administered to these same students, and teachers provided judgments of the students' reading skills.…
Descriptors: Skill Analysis, Prediction, Minority Groups, Reading Skills
Hintze, John M.; Silberglitt, Benjamin – School Psychology Review, 2005
The purpose of this study was to compare different statistical and methodological approaches to standard setting and determining cut scores using R-CBM and performance on high-stakes tests. One thousand seven hundred and sixty-six students were followed longitudinally from first through third grades using R-CBM benchmark assessment. In addition,…
Descriptors: Predictive Validity, High Stakes Tests, Standard Setting, Clinical Diagnosis