Descriptor
| Communication Research | 1 |
| Constitutional History | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Democratic Values | 1 |
| Federal State Relationship | 1 |
| Persuasive Discourse | 1 |
| Political Issues | 1 |
| Rhetorical Criticism | 1 |
| United States History | 1 |
Author
| Einhorn, Lois J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Historical Materials | 1 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Speeches/Meeting Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Virginia | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| United States Constitution | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedEinhorn, Lois J. – Southern Communication Journal, 1990
Examines how the timing of Virginia's Ratification Convention twisted the principles of presumption and burden of proof in favor of the Federalists. Applies Richard Whately's rhetorical constructs to actual debates to analyze rhetorical strategies and voting behavior. Argues the need to modify the meaning of presumption and burden of proof. (KEH)
Descriptors: Communication Research, Constitutional History, Debate, Democratic Values
