Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Aphasia | 2 |
| Communication Disorders | 2 |
| Scoring | 2 |
| Adults | 1 |
| Child Language | 1 |
| Diagnostic Tests | 1 |
| Difficulty Level | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Federal Aid | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| German | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Bay, Elisabeth | 1 |
| Christoph, Swetlana | 1 |
| Fergadiotis, Gerasimos | 1 |
| Grande, Marion | 1 |
| Huber, Walter | 1 |
| Hula, William D. | 1 |
| Hussmann, Katja | 1 |
| Martin, Nadine | 1 |
| Piefke, Martina | 1 |
| Willmes, Klaus | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHula, William D.; Fergadiotis, Gerasimos; Martin, Nadine – American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2012
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify the most appropriate item response theory (IRT) measurement model for aphasia tests requiring 2-choice responses and to determine whether small samples are adequate for estimating such models. Method: Pyramids and Palm Trees (Howard & Patterson, 1992) test data that had been collected from…
Descriptors: Sample Size, Guessing (Tests), Aphasia, Item Response Theory
Grande, Marion; Hussmann, Katja; Bay, Elisabeth; Christoph, Swetlana; Piefke, Martina; Willmes, Klaus; Huber, Walter – International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 2008
Background: Spontaneous speech of aphasic persons is often scored on rating scales assessing aphasic symptoms. Rating scales have the advantage of an easy and fast scoring system, but might lack sensitivity. Quantitative analysis of either aphasic symptoms or basic parameters provides a useful alternative. Basic parameters are essential units of…
Descriptors: Speech Communication, Aphasia, Child Language, Rating Scales
