Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 38 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 93 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 254 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 347 |
Descriptor
College Students | 482 |
Writing Evaluation | 482 |
Foreign Countries | 208 |
Second Language Learning | 202 |
English (Second Language) | 199 |
Writing Instruction | 172 |
Second Language Instruction | 153 |
Writing Skills | 136 |
Writing (Composition) | 130 |
Higher Education | 118 |
Essays | 104 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Location
China | 26 |
Turkey | 18 |
Japan | 14 |
Indonesia | 12 |
Iran | 12 |
Saudi Arabia | 12 |
Taiwan | 11 |
South Korea | 7 |
California | 6 |
Germany | 6 |
Australia | 5 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Americans with Disabilities… | 1 |
Rehabilitation Act 1973… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Huiying Cai; Xun Yan – Language Testing, 2024
Rater comments tend to be qualitatively analyzed to indicate raters' application of rating scales. This study applied natural language processing (NLP) techniques to quantify meaningful, behavioral information from a corpus of rater comments and triangulated that information with a many-facet Rasch measurement (MFRM) analysis of rater scores. The…
Descriptors: Natural Language Processing, Item Response Theory, Rating Scales, Writing Evaluation
Li Dong – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2024
Within the context of Chinese university education, effective communication in the field of second language writing heavily relies on lexical complexity, yet the role of writing feedback perception in relation to lexical complexity remains elusive. This study introduces a comprehensive writing feedback perception model encompassing perceptions of…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Students, Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction
Jianhua Zhang; Lawrence Jun Zhang – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2024
This study mainly explored the effects of teacher feedback, peer feedback and automated feedback on the use of metacognitive strategies in EFL writing. Ninety-seven participants were recruited and divided into three groups, who received two months of feedback from teachers, peers and an automatic writing evaluation system, respectively, and then…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Metacognition, English (Second Language), Second Language Learning
Yang Yang; Ze Zheng – Contemporary Educational Technology, 2024
In the existing literature, scholars have proposed various indices to measure the lexical richness (LR) of English as a foreign language (EFL) writing. However, there are currently issues of redundant indices and inconsistent usage. Attempting to address the research question of which indices are the most sensitive and effective ones to…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Lexicology, English (Second Language), Writing (Composition)
Xu Li; Shiyan Jiang; Yue Hu; Xiaoxiao Feng; Wenzhi Chen; Fan Ouyang – Education and Information Technologies, 2024
While the importance of feedback in education is well established, the effects of structured knowledge in collaborative academic writing remains uncertain. This study introduces an academic writing feedback tool that combines structured knowledge mining, analysis, and visualization. An empirical experiment was conducted in a second-year university…
Descriptors: Academic Language, Collaborative Writing, Cognitive Structures, Feedback (Response)
Noroozi, Omid; Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem; Biemans, Harm J. A.; Smits, Mattijs; Vervoort, Mariëtte T. W.; Verbaan, Caro-Lynn – Education and Information Technologies, 2023
We know little to what extent peer feedback strategies can be applied on a large scale in higher education for complex tasks. This study aimed to design, implement, and evaluate an online-supported peer feedback module for large-scale use to enhance higher education students' argumentative essay writing performance. To do this, 330 students from…
Descriptors: Curriculum Development, Curriculum Implementation, Curriculum Evaluation, Electronic Learning
Chunping Zheng; Xu Chen; Huayang Zhang; Ching Sing Chai – Language Learning & Technology, 2024
This quasi-experimental research investigates the employment of a formative assessment platform aided by artificial intelligence in an English public speaking course. The platform integrates deep learning, automatic speech recognition, and automatic writing evaluation. It provides automated assessment and immediate feedback on speakers' public…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Comparative Analysis, Feedback (Response), Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Liang Liao – Teaching in Higher Education, 2024
This study explores how assessment criteria are applied in grading student work. It is found that explicit assessment criteria do not work as authoritative guidance as expected and that tacit criteria are more decisive in awarding a certain grade. Various sources that form idiosyncratic tacit criteria are identified. These sources, including…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Grading, Criterion Referenced Tests, Criteria

Benjamin Motz; Harmony Jankowski; Jennifer Lopatin; Waverly Tseng; Tamara Tate – Grantee Submission, 2024
Platform-enabled research services will control, manage, and measure learner experiences within that platform. In this paper, we consider the need for research services that examine learner experiences "outside" the platform. For example, we describe an effort to conduct an experiment on peer assessment in a college writing course, where…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Learning Management Systems, Electronic Learning, Peer Evaluation
Tessier, Jack T.; Tessier, Lisa M.; Gashler, Daniel; Levitt, Cheryle; London, Julie; West, Benjamin S.; Winters, Nancy – College Teaching, 2023
College faculty faces decisions about how to provide feedback on written work. We compared the quality of student writing and student impressions of feedback from both full and minimal markup methods. There was only one significant difference in the quality of writing or content between full and minimal markup. Students scored the functionality of…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Writing Instruction, Writing Improvement, Writing Skills
Teguh Budiharso; Imroatus Solikhah; Samsu Armadi; Rano Wandana – Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 2024
This research uses Bloom's taxonomy in English-language writing and speaking skills assessment rubrics. A descriptive qualitative research method was adopted, and data were collected through observations, interviews, and English major students' course grades. Five lecturers and 25 students participated in the research, and the findings revealed…
Descriptors: Taxonomy, Scoring Rubrics, Evaluation Methods, Writing Evaluation
Benito Ilich Suárez-Bedolla; Francisco Cervantes-Pérez; Beatriz Feijoó-Fernández – Open Praxis, 2024
A common diagnosis in the literature is that the writing of Spanish speakers is generally a structural problem. The writing of 81 university students was analysed by classifying the teacher's comments based on 11 variables that were recorded once during a continuous evaluation that supported the assessment. The techniques used were Content…
Descriptors: Spanish Speaking, College Students, Communication (Thought Transfer), Models
Masrul Masrul; Santi Erliana – Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 2024
Writing is hard for students who are learning English; they often find it challenging to transform what is on their mind in writing. Therefore, this study examined the relationship between the writing test and assessment writing through argumentative writing. Data was analyzed using the correlation test to determine the close relationship between…
Descriptors: Writing Tests, Writing Evaluation, Second Language Learning, English (Second Language)
Dong, Zhe; Gao, Ying; Schunn, Christian D. – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2023
Peer feedback activities are characterized by peers performing both roles of feedback provider and receiver, and peers are found to benefit from both roles. However, in current feedback literacy studies, the emphasis has been overwhelmingly given to students' understandings, capacities and dispositions in receiving feedback, and existing student…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Assessment Literacy, Writing Evaluation
Wenxiao Zhang; Yanqing Li; Wan Zhang – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This quasi-experiment tested whether co-constructing a writing rubric gives students an advantage over only using the co-constructed rubric. We used students' perception and use of the rubric, and their writing performance as outcome variables. One hundred and twenty-six second-year university students who enrolled in an elective course…
Descriptors: Scoring Rubrics, Teacher Student Relationship, Student Participation, Writing (Composition)