Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Author
| Bejar, Isaac I. | 1 |
| Benjamin Koester | 1 |
| Brian K. Sato | 1 |
| Chris Mead | 1 |
| Hye Rin Lee | 1 |
| Kameryn Denaro | 1 |
| Marco Molinaro | 1 |
| Meryl Motika | 1 |
| Montserrat Valdivia Medinaceli | 1 |
| Nita Tarchinski | 1 |
| Rebecca L. Matz | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Journal Articles | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkKameryn Denaro; Marco Molinaro; Stefano Fiorini; Rebecca L. Matz; Chris Mead; Meryl Motika; Nita Tarchinski; Montserrat Valdivia Medinaceli; W. Carson Byrd; Benjamin Koester; Hye Rin Lee; Timothy McKay; Brian K. Sato – CBE - Life Sciences Education, 2024
Examining institutional data from seven cohorts of students intending to major in biology across five research-intensive institutions, this work analyzes opportunity gaps -- defined as the difference between the grade received by students from the dominant and nondominant sociodemographic groups in institutions of higher education -- at the…
Descriptors: College Students, First Generation College Students, Low Income Students, Minority Group Students
Download full textBejar, Isaac I.; And Others – 1977
Information provided by typical and improved conventional classroom achievement tests was compared with information provided by an adaptive test covering the same subject matter. Both tests were administered to over 700 college students in a general biology course. Using the same scoring method, adaptive testing was found to yield substantially…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Tests, Adaptive Testing, Biology
