Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Bias | 2 |
College Students | 2 |
Grading | 2 |
Group Activities | 2 |
Peer Evaluation | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Behavior | 1 |
Business Administration… | 1 |
Cooperative Learning | 1 |
Formative Evaluation | 1 |
Friendship | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Chowdhury, Mehdi – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2020
The method of normalisation combined with peer ratings is utilised to provide the solution to the biased rating problem of mapping group work marks to individual marks. We critically evaluate the method of normalisation following the findings of an article which argued against the use of self and/or peer rating mechanism. We demonstrate that the…
Descriptors: Game Theory, Peer Evaluation, Behavior, Group Activities
Sridharan, Bhavani; Tai, Joanna; Boud, David – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2019
The accuracy and consistency of peer marking, particularly when students have the power to reward (or penalise) during formative and summative assessment regimes, is largely unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate students' ability and behaviour in marking their peers' teamwork performance in a collaborative group assessment context…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Cooperative Learning, Group Activities