NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)2
Since 2006 (last 20 years)21
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 16 to 30 of 276 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Beran, Tanya; Violato, Claudio; Kline, Don; Frideres, Jim – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2009
Although measures of student ratings of instruction have been developed and examined empirically, students' attitudes about the utility of these ratings have yet to be meaningfully quantified. Using survey responses from 1229 students at a major Canadian university, we developed a psychometrically sound measure of the usefulness of student…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Factor Analysis, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Weschke, Barbara; Canipe, Stephen – Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 2010
The presentation will trace the experiences of two program directors from Walden University and their examination of issues involved with faculty assessment. Their experiences were used to create a simple but effective and workable model for faculty assessment and development. Once a presentation of how data were obtained, and analyzed, to create…
Descriptors: Faculty Evaluation, College Faculty, Curriculum Implementation, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Kreber, Carolin – Innovative Higher Education, 2002
Analyzes excellence in teaching, expertise in teaching, and the scholarship of teaching according to the nature and sources of knowledge construction underlying each. Illustrates the differences with practical examples. Asserts that excellence in teaching and the scholarship of teaching are both important but should be recognized and rewarded in…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Scholarship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rodin, Miriam; Rodin, Burton – Science, 1972
Correlates student assessment of teaching effectiveness and a measure of learning, and concludes that if how much students learn is considered to be a major component of good teaching, it must be concluded that good teaching is not validly measured by student evaluations in their present form'' because the students who learned the most rated…
Descriptors: Achievement, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Mathematics Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rice, R. Eugene – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002
Examines Ernest Boyer's 1990 Carnegie report, "Scholarship Reconsidered," as a "tipping point"--a critical turning point in what is fundamentally valued and rewarded in the scholarly work of faculty members. Gives special attention to the scholarship of teaching and the scholarship of engagement. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Faculty Workload
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Selmes, Cyril – Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1989
A professor outlines four types of college faculty evaluation (by superiors, by students, by peers, and by outsiders). His attitude toward basic assumptions underlying evaluation is analyzed in terms of values concerning the nature of knowledge, hierarchies, and teaching. Encouraged is evaluation with consultative and open procedures, tangible and…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Psychology, Existentialism
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meyer, Jan H. F.; Eley, Malcolm G. – British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2006
Background: The Approaches to Teaching Inventory (ATI) is structured as two main scales, reflecting a teacher-centred information-transmission approach versus a student-centred conceptual-change approach, each subdivided into intention and strategy subscales. Its use in higher education investigations is increasing and, by default, it is assuming…
Descriptors: Teaching Methods, Psychometrics, Test Items, Measures (Individuals)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Saroyan, Alenoush; Amundsen, Cheryl – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2001
Asserts that in order for teaching evaluation to encourage improvement, there must be a measure of all elements that make teaching what it is. Proposes a model that highlights the significance of conceptions, knowledge, and the context within which the instructional event takes place. Suggests activities and instruments that may assess teaching…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lawrence, Janet H. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 1988
Traditional ideas about improving teaching should be augmented by new understandings of faculty self-perception and motivation. At the National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning, professors have been interviewed to determine if faculty hold beliefs about an institution that influence their behavior. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Walsh, Donal A. – Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 2002
Reviews efforts to create and introduce measures to quantify the quality and scholarship of teaching by faculty in veterinary medicine. (EV)
Descriptors: College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education, Scholarship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Geis, George L. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1991
Conditions that can enhance college teachers' acceptance and productive use of feedback about instruction are outlined, including understanding of the purposes of evaluation, who provides the feedback, the message itself (form, timing, sources, and subsequent messages), characteristics of the recipient, immediate environment, and consequences…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Communication (Thought Transfer), Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rau, A. Ravi P.; Masse, Michelle A.; Wittkopf, Eugene R.; Kinney, Ralph A. – Academe, 2000
Presents recommendations of a faculty/administrator committee at Louisiana State University concerning faculty ranks and reviews, especially of nontenured full-time faculty who specialize in either teaching or research. It proposes rolling multiple-year contracts for instructors, new titles for non-teaching research scientists, university…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Contracts, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fincher, Ruth-Marie E.; Simpson, Deborah E.; Mennin, Stewart P.; Rosenfeld, Gary C.; Rothman, Arthur; McGrew, Martha Cole; Hansen, Penelope A.; Mazmanian, Paul E.; Turnbull, Jeffrey M. – Academic Medicine, 2000
Maintains that creative teaching with effectiveness that is rigorously substantiated, demonstrated educational leadership, and use of educational methods that advance learners' knowledge are consistent with the traditional definition of scholarship and faculty who meet these criteria are scholars and should be recognized by promotion. Outlines an…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Educational Quality, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fairweather, James S. – Journal of Higher Education, 2002
A principal belief embedded in promotion and tenure and in annual review decisions is that faculty members should and can be simultaneously productive in teaching and research. This study used national survey data to estimate by discipline and type of institution the percentage of faculty who meet this standard. (Author)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Leslie, David W. – Journal of Higher Education, 2002
Analysis of data from the 1993 National Survey of Postsecondary Faculty showed that faculty value teaching over research. At the same time, the explicit reward structure of academe favors research and publication, rewarding "productivity" in these arenas with money and status. Implications of this disconnect between values and rewards…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  19