Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 21 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Higher Education | 23 |
Postsecondary Education | 18 |
Audience
Practitioners | 50 |
Teachers | 32 |
Administrators | 24 |
Researchers | 3 |
Students | 2 |
Location
Canada | 6 |
Australia | 4 |
China | 4 |
United Kingdom | 3 |
United States | 3 |
Minnesota | 2 |
South Africa | 2 |
United Kingdom (England) | 2 |
Austria | 1 |
Belgium | 1 |
California | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating

Soderberg, L. O. – College Teaching, 1985
The continued nonevaluation of teaching contributes to the dominance of research in the evaluation of faculty members. For both promotion and salary increases, the number of articles published is basically the definition of research. The idea that research is more important than teaching is discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Development

Millis, Barbara J. – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Based on the idea that the skills needed to mentor a college faculty member in development of a reflective teaching portfolio are similar to those a composition teacher uses for student consultation, the process and guiding principles used by one mentor are described. Issues of portfolio organization and sources for objective feedback are also…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods

Webb, Jamie; McEnerney, Kathleen – Journal on Excellence in College Teaching, 1995
Describes the peer observation program developed by faculty at California State University, Dominguez Hills, its structure and adaptations, outcomes, and recommendations for development of formative peer observation programs. The program helps reduce faculty professional isolation by providing an informal structure for discussion of teaching and…
Descriptors: Classroom Observation Techniques, College Faculty, College Instruction, Collegiality
Magner, Denise K. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 1997
A recent Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching report counters the conventional wisdom in academe that faculty research must be evaluated by standards different from those of teaching and service, maintaining that the different types of faculty work have much in common and must be judged similarly if teaching and service are to gain…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Educational Research, Employment Practices, Evaluation Criteria

Quinlan, Kathleen M. – Innovative Higher Education, 1996
Approaches to college faculty peer coaching and peer review are described, including team mentoring, reciprocal class visits, teaching circles, departmental teaching libraries, teaching portfolios, course portfolios, pedagogical colloquia, and departmental reviews. Methods can be adapted, combined for different goals, contexts. All rest on faculty…
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, College Faculty, College Instruction, Departments

Sutherland, Tracey E. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1996
Issues emerging in the use of active learning techniques at the college level are summarized, including faculty's risk of colleagues' disapproval, risk of student disapproval, creation of a positive classroom environment, inclusiveness and equitable participation, course and student evaluation, and use of electronic tools for instructional…
Descriptors: Active Learning, Classroom Environment, Classroom Techniques, College Faculty
Diamond, Robert M. – Metropolitan Universities: An International Forum, 1994
Several national projects supported by professional associations are redefining faculty roles and focusing the energies of faculty on teaching, on community service, and on their institutions' missions. Resulting faculty reward systems should recognize institutional mission, departmental priorities, the strength of individuals, and the uniqueness…
Descriptors: Ancillary School Services, College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Evaluation

Dunkin, M. J; Precians, R. P. – Higher Education, 1992
A study of 12 award-winning and 87 novice University of Sydney (Australia) faculty found award-winners had more complex and flexible concepts of teaching effectiveness; used a wider range of criteria for evaluating teaching; relied more on personal feelings, peer evaluation, and longer-term student learning; and used more systematic feedback…
Descriptors: Awards, Beginning Teachers, College Faculty, College Instruction

Osborne, Judith L. – College Teaching, 1998
Describes a system of undergraduate and graduate instructional evaluation that integrates student and peer evaluation techniques. The procedure has three steps: preliminary meeting between faculty member and peer facilitator; in-class assessment session in which the facilitator engages students in focused discussion of teaching, in the teacher's…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Methods, Faculty Evaluation
Seibert, Warren F. – 1977
Purdue University's participation as a fund associate in National Project III (NP III) for elevating the importance of teaching has its origins in a flexible and diagnostic instructional evaluation system called "CAFETERIA." CAFETERIA services include test development, scoring, and analysis; social surveys on topics of importance in…
Descriptors: College Instruction, Computer Oriented Programs, Course Evaluation, Educational Assessment

McKeachie, W. J. – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 1987
Evaluation alone will probably not improve teaching, but, when it is accompanied by feedback, information about teaching and learning, and work with a knowledgeable consultant, evaluation may lead to improvement. An experienced consultant can foster trust, offer encouragement, and provide guided practice to help faculty improve their teaching…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Consultants, Evaluation Methods

Miron, Mordechai – Higher Education in Europe, 1983
A Tel Aviv University study determined the characteristics of good teaching, as defined by college students, and the difference in concept and definitions among students in various disciplines. The most commonly cited characteristics included teacher delivery, advising, contribution to student thinking, and scholarly attributes. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Evaluation Criteria, Faculty Evaluation
Gullatt, David E.; Weaver, Sue Wells – 1997
This study examined the use of faculty development activities to improve the effectiveness of colleges and universities in the United States. A total of 116 institutions in 45 states responded to a mailed survey questionnaire on faculty development activities. It was found that all responding institutions included a faculty development component…
Descriptors: Activities, College Instruction, Colleges, Faculty Development
McKeachie, Wilbert J. – National Forum: Phi Kappa Phi Journal, 1983
The ultimate criterion of effective teaching is evidence of impact upon student learning. Three purposes of evaluations are identified: to help faculty improve, to make personnel decisions rewarding good teachers and getting rid of those who are not, and to help students choose courses more wisely. (MLW)
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Development
Seldin, Peter – Improving College and University Teaching, 1982
Four aspects of faculty self-evaluation are discussed: its relationship to student ratings and teacher characteristics; its use for personnel decisions and improving performance; sample self-evaluation forms and their proper use; and faculty growth contracts. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Development, Faculty Evaluation