Publication Date
In 2025 | 2 |
Since 2024 | 26 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 111 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 257 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 460 |
Descriptor
College Faculty | 1070 |
Teacher Evaluation | 1057 |
Higher Education | 514 |
Teacher Effectiveness | 374 |
Student Evaluation of Teacher… | 246 |
Evaluation Methods | 238 |
Foreign Countries | 236 |
Teacher Attitudes | 182 |
Student Attitudes | 171 |
College Students | 160 |
Faculty Development | 145 |
More ▼ |
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Practitioners | 47 |
Teachers | 25 |
Administrators | 22 |
Researchers | 7 |
Policymakers | 4 |
Students | 1 |
Location
Australia | 25 |
Canada | 25 |
United Kingdom | 23 |
China | 21 |
California | 16 |
United States | 14 |
Turkey | 11 |
Spain | 10 |
Mexico | 9 |
Pennsylvania | 8 |
Germany | 7 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Equal Employment Opportunity… | 1 |
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
Praxis Series | 4 |
National Teacher Examinations | 2 |
Student Opinion Survey | 2 |
National Assessment of… | 1 |
Students Evaluation of… | 1 |
Teacher Performance… | 1 |
Teacher Rating Scale | 1 |
Test of English as a Foreign… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Heydinger, Richard B.; Simsek, Hasan – 1992
This publication, one of a series examining the issue of faculty workload and productivity, argues that the key to institutional change in higher education is the role of college faculty and offers recommendations for improving and measuring college faculty productivity. The paper begins with a conceptual model for discussing faculty productivity,…
Descriptors: Accountability, College Faculty, Faculty College Relationship, Faculty Workload
Santa Fe Community Coll., NM. – 1989
This collection of materials describes various aspects of Santa Fe Community College's (SFCC's) faculty and staff development program. Part 1 explains the philosophy that underpins staff development at SFCC; the planning, programming, information dissemination, and evaluation phases of staff development; and the use of professional development…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Community Colleges, Enrichment Activities, Faculty Development
Hsu, Yi-Ming; White, William F. – 1978
There are two purposes for this study: first, to examine the relationship between college students' achievement and their ratings of instructors; second, to validate the two selected evaluation instruments that were designed specially for assessing teaching performance at the higher education level. Two evaluation inventories were selected for…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Behavior Rating Scales, College Faculty, Higher Education
Majer, Kenneth; Stayrook, Nicholas – 1973
The reliability of the two most widely used course evaluation instruments at Indiana University was examined. The 38-item Form A, a modification of a course-evaluation instrument reported by Hildebrand and Wilson, at the University of California at Davis, asked students to rate instructors on a seven-point scale, from excellent to poor. The…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Higher Education, Questionnaires
Wood, Peter H. – 1978
Faculty of the education department of a midwestern university were rated as teachers by both students and peers, and ranked by peers as to their effectiveness in service and research. Student ratings were gathered from three questions on The Student Description of Teaching form, which concerned assessment of the teacher, the is appended. Access…
Descriptors: Bias, College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria
Fearing, Joseph L. – 1980
It is suggested that controversy concerning faculty productivity assessment and development is an outcome of different conceptions or frames of reference: the romanticist is far more likely to perceive and relate to the social aspects, while the classicist is much more aware of and attuned to the technical aspects. Factors affecting productivity…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Accountability, College Faculty, Educational Assessment
Massey, T. Benjamin – 1978
The question "what is good teaching" is answered variously by those that have a stake in the quality of undergraduate teaching. Students define good teaching in terms of the quality of their learning experience. Faculty define it in terms of learning outcomes. Administrators focus on efficiency, while members of the community focus on…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Instructional Innovation, Literature Reviews, Part Time Faculty
Gibson, Kenneth
The major problem faced by those who would evaluate teaching has been the difficulty of defining teaching effectiveness or establishing criteria for measurement. Traditionally, evaluations have focused on teacher performance in the classroom or on teacher traits as the criteria of effectiveness. However, previous studies have indicated that…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Administrator Attitudes, College Faculty, Community Colleges
Kramer, J. Lance – 1976
The development of faculty individual activity/performance agreements, a systematic set of procedures through which the goals or objectives of an institution are expressed as specific behaviors of an individual teacher, are discussed. These types of agreements also have been called growth plans or performance contracts. University objectives and…
Descriptors: Administrator Guides, Behavioral Objectives, College Faculty, Faculty College Relationship
1967
THIS REPORT PRESENTS THREE CASE STUDIES OF DIFFICULT CAMPUS PERSONNEL PROBLEMS TO BE CONSIDERED FROM THE POINTS OF VIEW OF FACULTY, DEPARTMENT HEADS, AND ADMINISTRATORS. THE DISCUSSION OF POSSIBLE SOLUTIONS TO THESE SITUATIONS OCCUPIED PART OF THE WEEK. OTHER TOPICS COVERED WERE THE VARIOUS BARRIERS TO COMMUNICATION (INDIVIDUAL, SOCIAL, AND…
Descriptors: Administrative Problems, Administrator Responsibility, College Faculty, Communication Problems
O'Tuel, Frances S. – 1979
A 16-item Q-sort evaluation of teaching was administered to 2,784 graduate and undergraduate students in education at a state university. Four subscales based on Spady's (1974) teacher competencies model, subject expertise, pedagogical expertise, stimulation and empathy were obtained from two pilot studies. Test-retest reliability and construct…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Education Courses, Evaluation Criteria
Johnson, James F.; Trent, Curtis – 1977
The study determined the influence of students' values and adult education attitudes on their evaluation of faculty. Eighty-four adult education graduate students, enrolled in four sections of an adult learning theory course taught by three different instructors, completed an evaluation form, a value survey, and an adult education attitude scale…
Descriptors: Adult Education, College Faculty, Course Evaluation, Educational Attitudes
Whetstone, Robert D. – 1974
This is a report of the development of a Faculty-Course Questionnaire (FCQ) evaluation instrument at the University of Colorado. The evaluation process is computer based and is similar in several ways to that used for processing and reporting the results of the Strong Vocational Interest Blank at the University of Colorado. A computerized feedback…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Oriented Programs, Course Evaluation, Critical Incidents Method
Tobias, Sigmund; Hanlon, Robert E. – 1974
This study examined whether student attitude toward instructors was related to subsequent behavior such as the behavioral intention to take further courses with that instructor, and whether social desirability affected this relationship. Students completed instructor rating and social desirability scales. Principal components analysis and varimax…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Factor Analysis, Factor Structure, Higher Education
State Univ. of New York, Buffalo. Millard Fillmore Coll. – 1973
Evaluations of one-hundred seventy-two courses taught at Millard Fillmore College (SUNY, Buffalo) during the 1971-72 academic year are presented. Students enrolled in these courses provided the ratings. A standard format is used to present item by item responses of the students to the 43 questions in the survey form for each course. The first six…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Course Evaluation, Instructional Improvement