NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 631 to 645 of 1,070 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Theall, Michael; Franklin, Jennifer – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2001
Examines the role of technology in teaching evaluation, discussing the need to incorporate the principles of good evaluation practice as evaluation systems become increasingly automated. Suggests applications of technology that hold promise for improving evaluation practice, such as teacher-course evaluation systems. (EV)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Computer Oriented Programs, Computer Uses in Education, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Aleamoni, Lawrence M. – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1999
Examines 16 myths regarding student rating of instructors and instruction from the perspective of research that has been conducted over 74 years. Concludes that the myths actually are, on the whole, myths. Suggests ways to improve and document instructional effectiveness. (Contains 153 references.) (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Educational Research, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fossey, Richard; Wood, R. Craig – New Directions for Community Colleges, 2004
This chapter provides an overview of academic freedom and tenure as applied to the community college.
Descriptors: Tenure, Academic Freedom, Community Colleges, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Van Ast, John; Field, Dennis W. – Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 2005
This investigation used data collected from students who assessed their instructors' teaching and learning effectiveness. Instructors were community-college career and technical-education faculty enrolled in the Community College Induction Mentoring Program (CCIM), a jointly sponsored program between Iowa State University and the instructors'…
Descriptors: Teacher Effectiveness, Instructional Effectiveness, Student Surveys, Student Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wood, Leigh N.; Harding, Ansie – International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 2007
Measurement of the quality of teaching activities is becoming increasingly important since universities are rewarding performance in terms of promotion, awards and bonuses and research is no longer the only key performance indicator. Good teaching is not easy to identify and measure. This paper specifically deals with the issue of good teaching in…
Descriptors: Teacher Competencies, Teacher Effectiveness, College Faculty, Teacher Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Wotruba, Thomas R.; Wright, Penny L. – Journal of Higher Education, 1975
A 5-step methodology is presented for developing a teaching effectiveness rating instrument: (1) development of an item pool, (2) screening of the item pool, (3) survey assessment of the screened items for importance and for student ability to rate, (4) response analysis, (5) development of the evaluation instrument options. (Editor/JT)
Descriptors: Classroom Research, College Faculty, Educational Research, Higher Education
Redefer, Frederick L. – Improving College and University Teaching, 1975
A Professor Emeritus of New York University reviews the practice of awarding recognition for superior college teaching (great teacher awards) concluding that they do not increase great teaching or the number of great teachers. He suggests that prospective students should seriously ask colleges what they do to insure good teaching. (JT)
Descriptors: College Choice, College Faculty, College Instruction, College Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cowen, David L.; And Others – Journal of Medical Education, 1976
In developing a community medicine course with a lecture-seminar form, the University of Kentucky College of Medicine used a peer review process in which proposed lectures and seminar materials were presented to the faculty who played the role of students as well as peer reviewers. The process was considered valuable. (JT)
Descriptors: College Faculty, Curriculum Development, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Burkhalter, Bettye B., Ed.; Buford, James A., Jr., Ed. – 1989
Designed primarily as a functional tool and reference book for administrators, this book provides a collection of essays covering various aspects of the performance appraisal of college faculty, administrators, and support staff. The booklet presents practical information on the key concepts, theories, practices, and legal constraints in…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, College Faculty, Compliance (Legal), Evaluation Criteria
Helms, Lelia B.; Seal, Julienne – 1988
The status of litigation involving dismissals of tenured faculty for reasons of incompetence, broadly defined, is evaluated. In practice, there is no consensus within higher education as to what constitutes adequate cause based on incompetence for dismissal of faculty members. The following issues are explored: (1) the pattern of increasing…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Court Litigation, Faculty Evaluation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Jaeger, Richard M.; Freijo, Tom D. – Journal of Educational Psychology, 1974
Two questions were investigated: (1) would rewording items on a questionnaire for evaluating faculty teaching effectiveness substantially affect students' ratings? and (2) would students' ratings of professors' teaching quality be totally consistent with their ratings of benefits derived from courses? (Author/RC)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Course Evaluation, Evaluation Methods
Hildebrandt, H. W. – 1977
Teachers of business communication, along with teachers in other disciplines, must develop ways of responding to demands for faculty evaluation. The first section of this paper considers three questions relevant to any kind of faculty evaluation: To whom should a teacher be accountable? What criteria should be the touchstones for evaluation? and,…
Descriptors: Accountability, Business Communication, College Faculty, Evaluation Criteria
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McKeachie, W. J.; Lin, Yi-Guang – Journal of Educational Research, 1975
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Discriminant Analysis, Factor Analysis
Powell, J. P. – 1976
The nature of competent teaching is discussed and distinctions between competent and incompetent teaching are made. Teaching involves the intention to bring about learning and competence in a method designed to bring about learning. Teaching is defined as educative when it is conducted in a morally acceptable manner and when the content of what is…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Competence, Learning Experience
Baker, Jack; Karwoski, Gail Langer – 1974
This system of student evaluation of teaching was developed for use at any teaching facility. Based on a 1964 study, the authors postulated that there are six "universal" dimensions of teaching that can be identified in diverse teaching situations. A random sample of 2,000 University of Minnesota students were asked to place…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Evaluation Methods, Higher Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45  |  46  |  47  |  ...  |  72