Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Academe | 9 |
Author
Bing, Robert | 1 |
Duryea, Edwin D. | 1 |
Dye, Linda | 1 |
Grossman, Michael B. | 1 |
Hanson, W. Lee | 1 |
Richardson, James T. | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 9 |
Numerical/Quantitative Data | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
Practitioners | 5 |
Teachers | 5 |
Administrators | 4 |
Location
Nevada | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Richardson, James T. – Academe, 2009
Nevada has a unitary system of public higher education, with eight institutions serving some 100,000 students in the Nevada System of Higher Education (NSHE). Included in the NSHE are two research universities, a world-renowned freestanding research institution, one recently established state college, and four community colleges, including one of…
Descriptors: Public Education, Higher Education, State Colleges, Governance

Academe, 1985
The AAUP's committee on College and University Government's response to the American Association of State Colleges and Universities' statement on academic governance and the faculty role in it is presented. (MSE)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Faculty, Faculty College Relationship, Governance

Duryea, Edwin D.; Grossman, Michael B. – Academe, 1983
The 1982 dismissal of a college president is outlined and examined. At issue were: the politics of the process of dismissal, which involved the state governor; lack of involvement of faculty, students or staff in the decision; and principles of governance relationships in colleges and universities. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Board Administrator Relationship, College Administration, College Faculty

Academe, 1986
The proportions of tenure-track faculty appointments in doctoral-level, comprehensive, general baccalaureate, specialized, and two-year public, private, and church-related colleges are tabulated for each academic rank. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Church Related Colleges, College Faculty, Full Time Faculty

Academe, 1986
The implications of applying state sunshine laws to state colleges and universities are examined. Considerations of political pressure, loss of privacy for individuals, difficulty in obtaining candid evaluations, and the threat of competition are cited. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Competition, Decision Making

Academe, 1996
The report of the American Association of University Professors' Committee C on College and University Teaching, Research, and Publication extends discussion of faculty workload issues by examining external attempts to legislate and regulate the way in which faculty in public higher education institutions distribute their work. Focus is on…
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Instruction, Faculty Workload, Government School Relationship

Academe, 1983
Tables and narrative analysis are presented for salary trends for all ranks of college faculty in 2,532 public and private institutions. Slight real increases in salary are found, with public institutions behind private colleges. In the past decade, faculty salaries have fallen behind those in the private sector. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), College Faculty, Comparative Analysis, Cost Indexes

Hanson, W. Lee; And Others – Academe, 1984
The AAUP annual report includes a summary of the annual survey and its results, tables of salaries and college faculty salary trend information by rank and institution type, explanations of the statistical data, data for individual institutions given alphabetically by state, data for preclinical medical school departments, and notes. (MSE)
Descriptors: Academic Rank (Professional), Church Related Colleges, College Faculty, Cost Indexes

Bing, Robert; Dye, Linda – Academe, 1992
The case of a dispute over the college faculty promotion process is examined in the context of a model of the organization of campus governance. The model describes three levels of power relationships with increasing amounts of shared responsibility between faculty and administration. A commitment to partnership is advocated. (MSE)
Descriptors: Administrator Role, Case Studies, College Administration, College Faculty