NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Laws, Policies, & Programs
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 241 to 255 of 259 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bahrick, Lorraine E.; Hernandez-Reif, Maria; Pickens, Jeffrey N. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1997
Tested hypothesis from Bahrick and Pickens' infant attention model that retrieval cues increase memory accessibility and shift visual preferences toward greater novelty to resemble recent memories. Found that after retention intervals associated with remote or intermediate memory, previous familiarity preferences shifted to null or novelty…
Descriptors: Attention, Cognitive Processes, Cues, Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Richardson, Ken – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1992
Children between 7 and 13 years of age were presented with scenarios for which they predicted a result derived from 2 or 3 interacting variables. The effect of the interaction of variables was observed for all ages in familiar scenarios, but the effect diminished in scenarios of unfamiliar activity. (BC)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bukach, Cindy M.; Bub, Daniel N.; Masson, Michael E. J.; Lindsay, D. Stephen – Cognitive Psychology, 2004
Studies of patients with category-specific agnosia (CSA) have given rise to multiple theories of object recognition, most of which assume the existence of a stable, abstract semantic memory system. We applied an episodic view of memory to questions raised by CSA in a series of studies examining normal observers' recall of newly learned attributes…
Descriptors: Patients, Recall (Psychology), Identification, Recognition (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Quinn, Paul C.; Schyns, Philippe G.; Goldstone, Robert L. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2006
The relation between perceptual organization and categorization processes in 3- and 4-month-olds was explored. The question was whether an invariant part abstracted during category learning could interfere with Gestalt organizational processes. A 2003 study by Quinn and Schyns had reported that an initial category familiarization experience in…
Descriptors: Perceptual Development, Classification, Infants, Infant Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Younger, Barbara A.; Fearing, Dru D. – Child Development, 1999
Three experiments used a familiarization/novelty or a habituation/dishabituation procedure to examine developmental change in infants' tendency to parse exemplars into separate categories. Results indicated that 10-month olds appeared to form differentiated categories, whereas 4- and 7-month olds formed a single category to include the range of…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Classification, Cognitive Processes, Familiarity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Zeelenberg, Rene; Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan; Shiffrin, Richard M. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2004
The authors argue that nonword repetition priming in lexical decision is the net result of 2 opposing processes. First, repeating nonwords in the lexical decision task results in the storage of a memory trace containing the interpretation that the letter string is a nonword; retrieval of this trace leads to an increase in performance for repeated…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Memory, Phonology, Cognitive Processes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Murai, Chizuko; Kosugi, Daisuke; Tomonaga, Masaki; Tanaka, Masayuki; Matsuzawa, Tetsuro; Itakura, Shoji – Developmental Science, 2005
We directly compared chimpanzee infants and human infants for categorical representations of three global-like categories (mammals, furniture and vehicles), using the familiarization-novelty preference technique. Neither species received any training during the experiments. We used the time that participants spent looking at the stimulus object…
Descriptors: Animals, Novelty (Stimulus Dimension), Infants, Classification
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mondloch, Catherine J.; Leis, Anishka; Maurer, Daphne – Child Development, 2006
Four-year-olds were tested for their ability to use differences in the spacing among features to recognize familiar faces. They were given a storybook depicting multiple views of 2 children. They returned to the laboratory 2 weeks later and used a "magic wand" to play a computer game that tested their ability to recognize the familiarized faces…
Descriptors: Child Behavior, Child Development, Child Psychology, Preschool Children
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wang, Su-hua; Baillargeon, Renee; Brueckner, Laura – Cognition, 2004
The present research examined alternative accounts of prior violation-of-expectation (VOE) reports that young infants can represent and reason about hidden objects. According to these accounts, young infants' apparent success in these VOE tasks reflects only novelty and familiarity preferences induced by the habituation or familiarization trials…
Descriptors: Infants, Thinking Skills, Expectation, Novelty (Stimulus Dimension)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Turk-Browne, Nicholas B.; Junge, Justin; Scholl, Brian J. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2005
The visual environment contains massive amounts of information involving the relations between objects in space and time, and recent studies of visual statistical learning (VSL) have suggested that this information can be automatically extracted by the visual system. The experiments reported in this article explore the automaticity of VSL in…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Visual Environment, Attention, Visual Learning
Cycowicz, Yael M.; And Others – 1994
Pictures are often used by cognitive psychologists to investigate the development of cognitive functions. Different attributes of the picture, such as object or picture familiarity, word frequency, and age of acquisition, are known to correlate with naming latency and to affect memory, particularly retrieval processes. But without the use of…
Descriptors: Adults, Age Differences, Cognitive Development, Cognitive Processes
Slater, Michael D. – 1989
Communication researchers should ask more explicit questions concerning the processes by which mediated messages can create, modify, or reinforce beliefs about social actors and social environments. There are four general categories into which to divide variables concerning processing strategies for mediated social information: source…
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Communication Research, Familiarity, Information Sources
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sangrigoli, Sandy; De Schonen, Scania – Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 2004
Background: People are better at recognizing faces of their own race than faces of another race. Such race specificity may be due to differential expertise in the two races. Method: In order to find out whether this other-race effect develops as early as face-recognition skills or whether it is a long-term effect of acquired expertise, we tested…
Descriptors: Recognition (Psychology), Race, Infants, Cognitive Ability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mayr, Susanne; Niedeggen, Michael; Buchner, Axel; Pietrowsky, Reinhard – Cognition, 2003
Negative priming refers to slowed down reactions when the distractor on one trial becomes the target on the next. Following two popular accounts, the effect might be due either to inhibitory processes associated with the frontal cortex, or to an ambiguity in the retrieval of episodic information. We used event-related brain potentials (ERPs) to…
Descriptors: Familiarity, Cognitive Processes, Cues, Reaction Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bermejo, Vicente; Lago, M. Oliva – International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1990
Cardinality responses are affected by both the direction and nature of the elements in the counting sequence. Error analysis suggests six stages in the acquisition of cardinality. Although there appears to be a developmental dependency between counting and cardinality, this relationship is not significant in all cases. (RH)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Cognitive Processes, Comprehension, Computation
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  12  |  13  |  14  |  15  |  16  |  17  |  18