Descriptor
| Cognitive Processes | 2 |
| Language Processing | 2 |
| Phonology | 2 |
| Individual Differences | 1 |
| Interference (Language) | 1 |
| Language Skills | 1 |
| Phoneme Grapheme… | 1 |
| Reaction Time | 1 |
| Semantics | 1 |
| Spelling | 1 |
| Word Recognition | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Holyk, Gregory G. | 2 |
| Pexman, Penny M. | 2 |
| Trew, Jennifer L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkHolyk, Gregory G.; Pexman, Penny M. – Brain and Language, 2004
Lukatela and Turvey (2000) demonstrated a phonological priming effect in the lexical decision task (LDT) with a 14-ms prime and concluded that phonology plays a central role in word meaning activation. In contrast, several other researchers reported that phonological priming is significant only at much longer prime durations (e.g., Ferrand &…
Descriptors: Phonology, Individual Differences, Semantics, Cognitive Processes
Pexman, Penny M.; Trew, Jennifer L.; Holyk, Gregory G. – Journal of Memory and Language, 2005
The process of naming an exception word prime (e.g., PINT) delays subsequent naming of a nonrhyming regular-inconsistent word body neighbor target (e.g., TINT). Both an activation account (Taraban & McClelland, 1987) and a learning account (Burt & Humphreys, 1993) have been offered to explain this interference effect. We investigated how long…
Descriptors: Phoneme Grapheme Correspondence, Phonology, Cognitive Processes, Interference (Language)
