Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Cheating | 3 |
| Student Attitudes | 3 |
| College Students | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Teacher Attitudes | 2 |
| Citations (References) | 1 |
| Codes of Ethics | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Documentation | 1 |
| Editing | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Higbee, Jeanne L. | 3 |
| Thomas, Pamela V. | 2 |
| Sanford, Thomas | 1 |
| Schultz, Jennifer L. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
| Information Analyses | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textHigbee, Jeanne L.; Schultz, Jennifer L.; Sanford, Thomas – Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 2011
A previous study conducted a decade ago determined that there can be considerable disagreement--not only between students and faculty, but also among students and among faculty--regarding behaviors that constitute cheating. This article reports the results of a research study that replicated the student survey administered for the previous study,…
Descriptors: Student Attitudes, Cheating, Student Surveys, Teacher Attitudes
Peer reviewedHigbee, Jeanne L.; Thomas, Pamela V. – NASPA Journal, 2002
Assesses whether faculty members and students consider specific behaviors cheating. This study differs from previous research in that it allows students and faculty to indicate conditions that may influence their opinions regarding the integrity of academic practices. Argues that it is imperative that faculty members, advisors, and counselors…
Descriptors: Cheating, College Students, Higher Education, School Orientation
Peer reviewedHigbee, Jeanne L.; Thomas, Pamela V. – Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 2000
Presents findings from a study of 251 faculty members and 227 undergraduate students, regarding attitudes about what constitutes academic dishonesty. States that, even within each group, there was considerable range of opinion on specific issues, such as whether it is dishonest for a student to turn in the same paper for two classes or to…
Descriptors: Cheating, Codes of Ethics, Evaluation Criteria, Higher Education
