Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Accountability | 4 |
Cheating | 4 |
High Stakes Tests | 4 |
Scores | 3 |
Testing | 3 |
Administrator Behavior | 2 |
Criticism | 2 |
Deception | 2 |
Decision Making | 2 |
Dropouts | 2 |
Federal Legislation | 2 |
More ▼ |
Author
Berliner, David C. | 4 |
Nichols, Sharon L. | 3 |
Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey | 1 |
Rideau, Sharon | 1 |
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative | 3 |
Books | 1 |
Journal Articles | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Arizona | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Amrein-Beardsley, Audrey; Berliner, David C.; Rideau, Sharon – Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2010
Educators are under tremendous pressure to ensure that their students perform well on tests. Unfortunately, this pressure has caused some educators to cheat. The purpose of this study was to investigate the types of, and degrees to which, a sample of teachers in Arizona were aware of, or had themselves engaged in test-related cheating practices as…
Descriptors: Cheating, Federal Legislation, Focus Groups, Testing
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Harvard Education Press, 2007
Drawing on their extensive research, Nichols and Berliner document and categorize the ways that high-stakes testing threatens the purposes and ideals of the American education system. For more than a decade, the debate over high-stakes testing has dominated the field of education. This passionate and provocative book provides a fresh perspective…
Descriptors: High Stakes Tests, Social Influences, Scores, Test Bias
The Inevitable Corruption of Indicators and Educators through High-Stakes Testing. Executive Summary
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This research provides lengthy proof of a principle of social science known as Campbell's law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor." Applying…
Descriptors: Cheating, Dropouts, High Stakes Tests, Social Indicators
Nichols, Sharon L.; Berliner, David C. – Education Policy Research Unit, 2005
This research provides lengthy proof of a principle of social science known as Campbell's law: "The more any quantitative social indicator is used for social decision-making, the more subject it will be to corruption pressures and the more apt it will be to distort and corrupt the social processes it is intended to monitor." Applying…
Descriptors: Cheating, Dropouts, High Stakes Tests, Social Indicators