Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Case Studies | 3 |
Change | 3 |
Stakeholders | 3 |
Context Effect | 2 |
Action Research | 1 |
Advocacy | 1 |
College Freshmen | 1 |
Communication Skills | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Doctoral Dissertations | 1 |
More ▼ |
Author
Albert, Sasha M. | 1 |
Barker, Dianne C. | 1 |
Caughlan, Ian | 1 |
Ewbank, Ann | 1 |
Grob, George | 1 |
Gutman, Marjorie A. | 1 |
Koyama, Dennis | 1 |
Nguyen, Samantha | 1 |
Ockey, Gary J. | 1 |
Setoguchi, Eric | 1 |
Wetzel, Keith | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Albert, Sasha M.; Gutman, Marjorie A.; Barker, Dianne C.; Nguyen, Samantha; Caughlan, Ian; Grob, George – American Journal of Evaluation, 2022
This article presents an analytic approach to assessing the relationship between policy advocacy activities and outcomes for discrete episodes of advocacy, using a holistic array of factors that affect the relationship between advocacy and policy change. The factors pertain to not only advocacy organizational structure and strategies, but also the…
Descriptors: Policy Analysis, Advocacy, Case Studies, Correlation
Wetzel, Keith; Ewbank, Ann – Educational Action Research, 2013
In this action research study, we describe how doctoral candidates conceptualize innovations for their dissertations and outline how we are using the results to improve the doctoral dissertation experience for our new cohort. Over the course of one academic year (2010/11) we documented our students' process of conceptualizing their…
Descriptors: Doctoral Dissertations, Action Research, Innovation, Graduate Students
Ockey, Gary J.; Koyama, Dennis; Setoguchi, Eric – Language Assessment Quarterly, 2013
Test takers should have a voice in testing practices (Mathew, 2004). However, when incorporating their input, systematic processes to ensure the validity of testing practices must be followed. Such processes allow for test development to be a more democratic process (Shohamy, 2001), without sacrificing the value of the resulting inferences made…
Descriptors: Test Construction, Stakeholders, Case Studies, Language Tests