Descriptor
| Case Studies | 2 |
| Decision Making | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Program Termination | 2 |
| Retrenchment | 2 |
| Budgeting | 1 |
| Change Agents | 1 |
| Change Strategies | 1 |
| College Administration | 1 |
| Governance | 1 |
| Governing Boards | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Currents | 1 |
| Trusteeship | 1 |
Author
| Blunt, Roger R. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 2 |
| Administrators | 1 |
| Practitioners | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Currents, 1991
Six college advancement professionals respond to a hypothetical case of across-the-board cuts in nonacademic departments by telling how they would make budgeting choices. The strategies used include involving senior advancement managers as a team, cultivating consensus, preserving priority projects, sharing responsibility among departments,…
Descriptors: Budgeting, Case Studies, Decision Making, Higher Education
Blunt, Roger R. – Trusteeship, 1994
It is not enough for university governing boards and chief executives to decide the system must change; leadership must convince constituents that everyone has something to gain. When the University of Maryland's campuses could not reach consensus in paring programs, the system board stepped in to foster collaboration and cooperation. (Author/MSE)
Descriptors: Case Studies, Change Agents, Change Strategies, College Administration
