NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 7 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Pann, James M.; DiLuzio, Elizabeth; Coghlan, Anne T.; Hughes, Scott D. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2023
This article explores the utility of mindfulness in the field of evaluation. Mindfulness is a translation of the ancient Indian word, "Sati," which means awareness, attention, and remembering. While definitions vary, a practical definition of mindfulness is present-moment awareness in an open and nonjudgmental manner. Mindfulness-based…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Educational Practices, Metacognition, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
McIntyre, Morgan E.; Rangelov, Dragan; Mattingley, Jason B. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 2022
Integrating evidence from multiple sources to guide decisions is something humans do on a daily basis. Existing research suggests that not all sources of information are weighted equally in decision-making tasks, and that observers are subject to biases in the face of internal and external noise. Here we describe two experiments that measured…
Descriptors: Visual Stimuli, Decision Making, Bias, Time
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Clikeman, Paul M.; Stevens, Jerry L. – Journal of Education for Business, 2019
Managerial accounting teaches students to make rational decisions by evaluating sunk costs, incremental costs, and opportunity costs. The behavioral literature suggests that biases and heuristics overcome rational thinking. The authors explore whether learning cost concepts attenuates behavioral biases. They find a statistically significant…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Accounting, Business Administration Education, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gino, Francesca; Shu, Lisa L.; Bazerman, Max H. – Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2010
People often make judgments about the ethicality of others' behaviors and then decide how harshly to punish such behaviors. When they make these judgments and decisions, sometimes the victims of the unethical behavior are identifiable, and sometimes they are not. In addition, in our uncertain world, sometimes an unethical action causes harm, and…
Descriptors: Ethics, Behavior, Evaluative Thinking, Influences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Friedman, Ori; Neary, Karen R.; Defeyter, Margaret A.; Malcolm, Sarah L. – New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2011
Appropriate behavior in relation to an object often requires judging whether it is owned and, if so, by whom. The authors propose accounts of how people make these judgments. Our central claim is that both judgments often involve making inferences about object history. In judging whether objects are owned, people may assume that artifacts (e.g.,…
Descriptors: Ownership, Behavior, Context Effect, Theories
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Boseovski, Janet J.; Lee, Kang – Social Development, 2008
The present study examined the use of consensus information in early childhood. Ninety-six three- to six-year-olds watched a demonstration that depicted the positive or negative behavior of one or several actors toward a recipient (low vs. high consensus, respectively). Subsequently, participants made behavioral predictions and personality…
Descriptors: Young Children, Behavior, Personality, Evaluative Thinking
Bush, Terry M.; Lashbrook, William B. – 1973
Initial credibility, use and non-use of evidence, and language intensity manipulate belief formation and change. Evidence supports the hypothesis that if a group of subject is exposed to a communicator who carries impressive credentials, uses specific data, and phrases a message in intense, fear-producing terms, the subjects will respond with…
Descriptors: Attitude Change, Attitudes, Behavior, Beliefs