Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 2 |
| Credibility | 2 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 2 |
| Information Sources | 2 |
| Internet | 2 |
| Secondary School Students | 2 |
| Academic Achievement | 1 |
| Adolescents | 1 |
| Critical Literacy | 1 |
| Critical Reading | 1 |
| Early Adolescents | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Marttunen, Miika | 2 |
| Hautala, Jarkko | 1 |
| Kiili, Carita | 1 |
| Leppänen, Paavo H. T. | 1 |
| Leu, Donald J. | 1 |
| Salminen, Timo | 1 |
| Utriainen, Jukka | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
| Finland | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMarttunen, Miika; Salminen, Timo; Utriainen, Jukka – Journal of Educational Research, 2021
This study investigated upper secondary school students' skills in evaluating the credibility and argumentative content of a blog text and a YouTube video. Both sources concerned child vaccination, the blog text opposing and the YouTube video supporting it. Students rated each source as credible, fairly credible or non-credible, justified their…
Descriptors: Evaluative Thinking, Thinking Skills, Secondary School Students, Adolescents
Kiili, Carita; Leu, Donald J.; Marttunen, Miika; Hautala, Jarkko; Leppänen, Paavo H. T. – Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2018
This study assessed the ability of 426 students (ages 12-13) to critically evaluate two types of online locations on health issues: an academic resource and a commercial resource. The results indicated limited evaluation abilities, especially for the commercial resource, and only a small, partial association with prior stance and offline reading…
Descriptors: Secondary School Students, Early Adolescents, Critical Reading, Health
