Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Auditory Perception | 2 |
| Auditory Tests | 2 |
| Acoustics | 1 |
| Assistive Technology | 1 |
| Auditory Discrimination | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Context Effect | 1 |
| Control Groups | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Developmental Tasks | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Texas | 2 |
| Texas (Austin) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSmiljanic, Rajka; Sladen, Douglas – Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2013
Purpose: In this study, the authors examined how signal clarity interacts with the use of sentence context information in determining speech-in-noise recognition for children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing. Method: One hundred and twenty sentences in which the final word varied in predictability (high vs. low semantic…
Descriptors: Assistive Technology, Semantics, Word Recognition, Experimental Groups
WOLFE, WILLIAM G.; AND OTHERS – 1959
AUDIOMETRIC AND VISUAL PROCEDURES WERE COMPARED ANALYTICALLY AND/OR DESIGNED TO ESTABLISH TEST METHODS FOR TRAINABLE MENTAL RETARDATES IN THE IQ RANGE OF 23-47 AND BELOW THE MENTAL AGE OF 4 YEARS. THE NUMBER OF SUBJECTS WAS 26 FOR THE AUDITORY PROGRAM AND 25 FOR THE VISUAL. EACH OF THE SUBJECTS WAS STUDIED ON AN INDIVIDUAL BASIS. DATA WERE…
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Auditory Tests, Comparative Analysis, Developmental Tasks
