NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Pell Grant Program1
Assessments and Surveys
Longitudinal Surveys of…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 37 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kacey Beddoes – International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2024
Despite their many benefits, longitudinal studies are much less common than one-time data collection or pre-post intervention designs. One reason for their scarcity is that longitudinal studies introduce requirements and challenges that non-longitudinal studies do not. One of the biggest challenges is participant attrition. In order to help…
Descriptors: Longitudinal Studies, Attrition (Research Studies), Research Problems, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Luke Miratrix; Ben Weidmann – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2022
Background/Context: Attrition has been described as "the Achilles Heel of the randomized experiment" (Shadish et al., 1998 p.3). Attrition looms as a threat because it can undermine group equivalence, eroding the methodological strength at the heart of a randomized evaluation. In particular, attrition could result in unobserved…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Statistical Bias, Attrition (Research Studies), Computation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Juan David Parra; D. Brent Edwards Jr. – Critical Studies in Education, 2024
This paper seeks to raise awareness among educational researchers and practitioners of some significant weaknesses and internal contradictions of randomised control trials (RCTs). Although critiques throughout the years from education scholars have pointed to the detrimental effects of this experimental approach on education practice and values,…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Evidence Based Practice, Educational Practices, Educational Policy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Troyer, Margaret – Journal of Research in Reading, 2022
Background: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have long been considered the gold standard in education research. Federal funds are allocated to evaluations that meet What Works Clearinghouse standards; RCT designs are required in order to meet these standards without reservations. Schools seek out interventions that are research based, in other…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Randomized Controlled Trials, Adolescents, Reading Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Deke, John; Wei, Thomas; Kautz, Tim – Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021
Evaluators of education interventions are increasingly designing studies to detect impacts much smaller than the 0.20 standard deviations that Cohen characterized as "small." While the need to detect smaller impacts is based on compelling arguments that such impacts are substantively meaningful, the drive to detect smaller impacts may…
Descriptors: Intervention, Program Evaluation, Sample Size, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mark Fredrickson; Ben B. Hansen – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2021
Context: Assessments of baseline equivalency of intervention and control groups, "balance," play a critical role in evaluating educational interventions. The highest What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) of the Institute of Educational Studies (IES) standard for educational studies, "Meets WWC Design Standards Without Reservations,"…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Experimental Groups, Control Groups, Intervention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Deke, John; Wei, Thomas; Kautz, Tim – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2018
Evaluators of education interventions increasingly need to design studies to detect impacts much smaller than the 0.20 standard deviations that Cohen (1988) characterized as "small." For example, an evaluation of Response to Intervention from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) detected impacts ranging from 0.13 to 0.17 standard…
Descriptors: Intervention, Program Evaluation, Sample Size, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2017
"Attrition" is the loss of sample during the course of a study. It occurs when individuals initially randomly assigned in a study are not included when researchers examine the outcome of interest. Attrition is a common issue in education research, and it occurs for many reasons. The What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) is an initiative of the…
Descriptors: Attrition (Research Studies), Control Groups, Experimental Groups, Randomized Controlled Trials
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sallam, Marwan H.; Martín-Monje, Elena; Li, Yan – Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2022
This study aims to explore the current published research on Language Massive Open Online Courses (LMOOCs), outlining the types of papers, countries where studies were performed and institutions devoted to this field. Also, it intends to classify the reviewed literature following a general categorisation of MOOCs, and to identify the main trends…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Educational Trends, Second Language Learning, MOOCs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Rickles, Jordan; Zeiser, Kristina – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2017
This paper describes and demonstrates a new online resource developed to help researchers proactively plan for student attrition: the Student Attrition Lookup Tool (SALT). With SALT, researchers can access student mobility estimates for different student and school subpopulations and for different transition periods from kindergarten to grade 12.…
Descriptors: Student Attrition, Attrition (Research Studies), Elementary Secondary Education, Educational Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Slavin, Robert E.; Cheung, Alan C. K. – Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 2017
Large-scale randomized studies provide the best means of evaluating practical, replicable approaches to improving educational outcomes. This article discusses the advantages, problems, and pitfalls of these evaluations, focusing on alternative methods of randomization, recruitment, ensuring high-quality implementation, dealing with attrition, and…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Evaluation Methods, Recruitment, Attrition (Research Studies)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dawson, Anneka; Yeomans, Emily; Brown, Elena Rosa – Educational Research, 2018
Background: The Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) is an independent charity that was established in 2011 with the explicit aim of breaking the link between family income and educational achievement in England. Over the seven years since its inception, EEF has contributed to the existing evidence base by funding over one hundred randomised…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Educational Research, Randomized Controlled Trials, Research Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Deke, John; Wei, Thomas; Kautz, Tim – National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, 2017
Evaluators of education interventions are increasingly designing studies to detect impacts much smaller than the 0.20 standard deviations that Cohen (1988) characterized as "small." While the need to detect smaller impacts is based on compelling arguments that such impacts are substantively meaningful, the drive to detect smaller impacts…
Descriptors: Intervention, Educational Research, Research Problems, Statistical Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
What Works Clearinghouse, 2014
Attrition occurs when members of the initial research sample are not part of the final analysis sample, such as due to missing data or leaving the study. Both the overall sample attrition and the differences in attrition between the groups can affect the statistical equivalence of the sample and create potential for bias. The WWC has given careful…
Descriptors: Attrition (Research Studies), Statistical Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Deke, John; Chiang, Hanley – Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2014
Meeting the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) attrition standard (or one of the attrition standards based on the WWC standard) is now an important consideration for researchers conducting studies that could potentially be reviewed by the WWC (or other evidence reviews). Understanding the basis of this standard is valuable for anyone seeking to meet…
Descriptors: Attrition (Research Studies), Student Attrition, Randomized Controlled Trials, Standards
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3