Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Attention | 3 |
Experimental Psychology | 3 |
Eye Movements | 3 |
College Students | 2 |
Identification | 2 |
Task Analysis | 2 |
Visual Stimuli | 2 |
Adults | 1 |
Classification | 1 |
Cognitive Processes | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Journal of Experimental… | 3 |
Author
Potter, Mary C. | 3 |
Wyble, Brad | 2 |
Bowman, Howard | 1 |
Nieuwenstein, Mark R. | 1 |
Olejarczyk, Jennifer | 1 |
Pandav, Rijuta | 1 |
Theeuwes, Jan | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 3 |
Audience
Location
Massachusetts | 2 |
Netherlands | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Potter, Mary C.; Wyble, Brad; Pandav, Rijuta; Olejarczyk, Jennifer – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
A pictured object can be readily detected in a rapid serial visual presentation sequence when the target is specified by a superordinate category name such as "animal" or "vehicle". Are category features the initial basis for detection, with identification of the specific object occurring in a second stage (Evans &…
Descriptors: Identification, Classification, Experimental Psychology, Attention
Nieuwenstein, Mark R.; Potter, Mary C.; Theeuwes, Jan – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009
When asked to identify 2 visual targets (T1 and T2 for the 1st and 2nd targets, respectively) embedded in a sequence of distractors, observers will often fail to identify T2 when it appears within 200-500 ms of T1--an effect called the "attentional blink". Recent work shows that attention does not blink when the task is to encode a…
Descriptors: Eye Movements, Identification, Observation, Visual Stimuli
Wyble, Brad; Bowman, Howard; Potter, Mary C. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2009
Transient attention to a visually salient cue enhances processing of a subsequent target in the same spatial location between 50 to 150 ms after cue onset (K. Nakayama & M. Mackeben, 1989). Do stimuli from a categorically defined target set, such as letters or digits, also generate transient attention? Participants reported digit targets among…
Descriptors: Stimuli, Attention, Cognitive Processes, Cues