Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Athletics | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Foreign Countries | 1 |
| Gender Bias | 1 |
| Human Body | 1 |
| Movement Education | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Peer Relationship | 1 |
| Physical Education Teachers | 1 |
| Preservice Teachers | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Björn Tolgfors | 1 |
| Erik Backman | 1 |
| Gunn Nyberg | 1 |
| Mikael Quennerstedt | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Sweden | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkErik Backman; Mikael Quennerstedt; Björn Tolgfors; Gunn Nyberg – Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 2024
Peer assessment has been proven to improve learning for both the observer and the observed. One dimension of peer assessment that has been given little attention in the context of physical education teacher education (PETE) is the tension that exists when peers give feedback on each other's work. In this paper, we report on Swedish preservice…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Physical Education Teachers, Preservice Teachers, Social Capital
