Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Age Differences | 2 |
| Conflict | 2 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 2 |
| Ability | 1 |
| Attribution Theory | 1 |
| Childhood Attitudes | 1 |
| Children | 1 |
| Comparative Analysis | 1 |
| Competition | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Individual Development | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMills, Candice M.; Landrum, Asheley R. – British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2012
Two studies examined developmental differences in how children weigh capability and objectivity when evaluating potential judges. In Study 1, 84 6- to 12-year-olds and adults were told stories about pairs of judges that varied in capability (i.e., perceptual capacity) and objectivity (i.e., the relationship to a contestant) and were asked to…
Descriptors: Young Children, Competition, Conflict, Evaluative Thinking
Peer reviewedRay, Glen E.; Cohen, Robert – Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 2000
Studied 8- and 11-year-olds as evaluators of peer group entry and limited resources. Found older children evaluated peers more positively than did younger for limited resources conflicts. Found all children evaluated the focal peer's intentions during group entry more negatively than intentions during limited resources and evaluated peer responses…
Descriptors: Age Differences, Attribution Theory, Childhood Attitudes, Children
