NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Surtees, Andrew D. R.; Apperly, Ian A. – Child Development, 2012
Children (aged 6-10) and adults (total N = 136) completed a novel visual perspective-taking task that allowed quantitative comparisons across age groups. All age groups found it harder to judge the other person's perspective when it differed from their own. This egocentric interference did not decrease with age, even though, overall, performance…
Descriptors: Theory of Mind, Perspective Taking, Children, Adults
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Surtees, Andrew D. R.; Butterfill, Stephen A.; Apperly, Ian A. – British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 2012
Studies with infants show divergence between performance on theory of mind tasks depending on whether "direct" or "indirect" measures are used. It has been suggested that direct measures assess a flexible but cognitively demanding ability to reason about the minds of others, whereas indirect measures assess distinct processes…
Descriptors: Developmental Psychology, Theory of Mind, Cognitive Development, Perspective Taking
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Samson, Dana; Apperly, Ian A.; Braithwaite, Jason J.; Andrews, Benjamin J.; Bodley Scott, Sarah E. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2010
In a series of three visual perspective-taking experiments, we asked adult participants to judge their own or someone else's visual perspective in situations where both perspectives were either the same or different. We found that participants could not easily ignore what someone else saw when making self-perspective judgments. This was observed…
Descriptors: Adults, Visual Stimuli, Perspective Taking, Barriers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dumontheil, Iroise; Apperly, Ian A.; Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne – Developmental Science, 2010
The development of theory of mind use was investigated by giving a computerized task to 177 female participants divided into five age groups: Child I (7.3-9.7 years); Child II (9.8-11.4); Adolescent I (11.5-13.9); Adolescent II (14.0-17.7); Adults (19.1-27.5). Participants viewed a set of shelves containing objects, which they were instructed to…
Descriptors: Late Adolescents, Adolescents, Cognitive Development, Child Development