Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Action Research | 3 |
| Program Evaluation | 3 |
| Evaluation Methods | 2 |
| Program Improvement | 2 |
| Data Analysis | 1 |
| Evaluation Utilization | 1 |
| Grants | 1 |
| Item Analysis | 1 |
| Mental Health | 1 |
| Philanthropic Foundations | 1 |
| Pilot Projects | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Evaluation Review | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedSadler, D. Royce – Evaluation Review, 1984
It is common practice to associate recommendations for program improvement with evaluation reports. In this article, several classes of recommendations are identified, and aspects of one class are explored in some detail. Consideration is given to certain logical, methodological, and practical issues relating to the derivation of recommendations…
Descriptors: Action Research, Evaluation Methods, Evaluation Utilization, Program Evaluation
Peer reviewedRoberts-Gray, Cynthia; And Others – Evaluation Review, 1987
When procedures for developing recommendations are integrated into evaluation methods, it is easier to produce useful recommendations for program improvement. (RB)
Descriptors: Action Research, Data Analysis, Evaluation Methods, Program Evaluation
Direct linkWhaley, Arthur L. – Evaluation Review, 2006
The lack of support for mental health-related projects by private philanthropy, even among those that express an interest in mental health, is due in large part to the subjectivity of the grant review process. To address this problem, Whaley, Rodriguez, and Alexander developed the Grant Proposal Rating Form (GPRF) to make the grant review process…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Philanthropic Foundations, Mental Health
