Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Evaluative Thinking | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Judges | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Pharmaceutical Education | 1 |
| Student Evaluation | 1 |
| Summative Evaluation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Practitioner Research in… | 1 |
Author
| Barber, Jill | 1 |
| Demonacos, Constantinos | 1 |
| Ellis, Steven | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Download full textDemonacos, Constantinos; Ellis, Steven; Barber, Jill – Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 2019
In this study we explored the potential of adaptive comparative judgement (ACJ) as a medium for peer assessment and for the giving and receiving of peer feedback. ACJ is a marking protocol in which the assessor (or judge) merely compares two answers and chooses a winner. Repeated judgements and a suitable sorting algorithm allow marks to be…
Descriptors: Student Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Grading, Accuracy
