NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
ERIC Number: EJ295868
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 1984
Pages: N/A
Abstractor: N/A
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: N/A
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
When Small Disputes Make Big Differences.
Lengel, James G.; Danzer, Gerald A.
Update on Law-Related Education, v8 n1 p7-9,63-65 Win 1984
In four historic cases, the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were faced with a broad range of disputes--some major, some seemingly minor--but with one overriding issue: Who shall interpret the Constitution? The President? The Congress? The States? The U.S. Supreme Court emerged as the law's final arbiter. (RM)
Descriptors: Constitutional History, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Government Role, Interdisciplinary Approach, Legal Education, Presidents, United States History
Publication Type: Historical Materials; Journal Articles
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A