ERIC Number: EJ1042194
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2014-Oct
Pages: 5
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0098-6283
EISSN: N/A
A Self-Correcting Approach to Multiple-Choice Exams Improves Students' Learning
Grühn, Daniel; Cheng, Yanhua
Teaching of Psychology, v41 n4 p335-339 Oct 2014
Montepare suggested the use of a self-correcting approach to multiple-choice tests: Students first take the exam as usual, but are allowed to hand in a self-corrected version afterwards. The idea of this approach is that the additional interaction with the material may foster further learning. To examine whether such an approach actually improves learning, we compared two large sections in psychology: one section used traditional exams and the other section used self-correcting midterm exams. Indeed, compared to the traditional approach, students using the self-correcting approach performed better on the final exam. Moreover, students who self-corrected more items performed better on the final exam above and beyond students' original performance. As a tool to foster students' engagement and learning, the self-correcting approach might be especially useful in large classroom settings.
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Self Evaluation (Individuals), Active Learning, Large Group Instruction, Scores, College Students, Developmental Psychology, Control Groups, Student Improvement, Comparative Analysis, Statistical Analysis, Error Correction, Cheating, Grade Inflation, Student Attitudes, Learner Engagement
SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail: journals@sagepub.com; Web site: http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2814
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A