Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Psychology | 2 |
| Teacher Attitudes | 2 |
| Achievement Gains | 1 |
| Assignments | 1 |
| Correlation | 1 |
| Editing | 1 |
| Educational Technology | 1 |
| Electronic Learning | 1 |
| Electronic Publishing | 1 |
| Feedback (Response) | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Teaching of Psychology | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| Teachers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMcCabe, Jennifer; Doerflinger, Alicia; Fox, Russell – Teaching of Psychology, 2011
This article presents student and faculty ratings of electronic editing (EE) functions (i.e., track changes, insert comments, highlighting) as used for "e-feedback" on written assignments. Students reported increased convenience, clarity of expectations, amount of feedback, and writing ability as well as substantial improvement in EE skills…
Descriptors: Feedback (Response), Student Attitudes, Writing Ability, Psychology
Peer reviewedHill, G. William, IV; And Others – Teaching of Psychology, 1993
Reports on a study of 91 psychology faculty who rated each of 39 extra-credit opportunities on 3 criteria: (1) their use of the item; (2) its educational value; and (3) the likelihood that all students would be able to complete the opportunity (access). Finds that approximately 82% used some form of extra-credit assignment. (CFR)
Descriptors: Assignments, Grading, Higher Education, Psychology
