Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
| Accountability | 2 |
| Case Studies | 2 |
| English (Second Language) | 2 |
| Federal Legislation | 2 |
| Observation | 2 |
| Second Language Learning | 2 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Classroom Environment | 1 |
| Corporations | 1 |
| Democracy | 1 |
| Democratic Values | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Teachers College Record | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
| Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 5 | 1 |
Audience
| Teachers | 2 |
Location
| California | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 2 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkWills, John S.; Sandholtz, Judith Haymore – Teachers College Record, 2009
Background/Context: In response to state-level test-based accountability and the federal No Child Left Behind Act, school administrators increasingly view centralized curriculum and prescribed instructional strategies as the most direct means of increasing student performance. This movement toward standardization reduces teachers' autonomy and…
Descriptors: Educational Strategies, Professional Autonomy, Federal Legislation, Observation
Sleeter, Christine E. – Teachers College Record, 2008
Background/Context: A challenge for teachers who support teaching for and about democracy is doing so while being pressed into directives rooted in corporatocracy, a political manifestation of neoliberalism. The accountability movement today, particularly No Child Left Behind, is rooted in much more firmly in corporatocracy than democracy.…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Democracy, Second Language Learning, Masters Theses
