Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Decoding (Reading) | 2 |
Reading Comprehension | 2 |
Reading Difficulties | 2 |
Reading Tests | 2 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Control Groups | 1 |
Correlation | 1 |
Environmental Influences | 1 |
Etiology | 1 |
Factor Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Scientific Studies of Reading | 2 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Colorado | 2 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
Peabody Individual… | 2 |
Gray Oral Reading Test | 1 |
Woodcock Johnson Tests of… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Hua, Anh N.; Keenan, Janice M. – Scientific Studies of Reading, 2014
Comprehension tests often compare accuracy on inferential versus literal questions and find inferential harder than literal, and poor comprehenders performing worse than controls. Difficulties in integration are assumed to be the reason. This research explores another reason--differences in memory for the passage information underlying the…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Reading Tests, Memory, Inferences
Betjemann, Rebecca S.; Keenan, Janice M.; Olson, Richard K.; DeFries, John C. – Scientific Studies of Reading, 2011
Does the choice of test for assessing reading comprehension influence the outcome of genetic analyses? A twin design compared two types of reading comprehension tests classified as primarily associated with word decoding (RC-D) or listening comprehension (RC-LC). For both types of tests, the overall genetic influence is high and nearly identical.…
Descriptors: Reading Comprehension, Listening Comprehension, Siblings, Genetics