NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1362217
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2022
Pages: 5
Abstractor: ERIC
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0036-8555
EISSN: EISSN-1943-4871
Debunking Myths of Standards-Based Grading: Addressing the Concerns and Providing Some Strategies for Implementing Alternative Grading Practices
Wilcox, Jesse; Townsley, Matt
Science Teacher, v90 n1 p29-33 Sep-Oct 2022
Traditionally, assessing and grading students in science has been an exercise centered around points and percentages (Feldman, Kropf, and Alibrandi 1989; Prøitz 2013). However, with the introduction of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) and the need to revisit grading practices stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic, an increasing number of schools have begun to revise their grading practices (Guskey 2021; Zalaznick 2022). Recent research suggests that when grade books transparently display students' current understanding, students have a better understanding of their knowledge and skills and can continue to improve them (Guskey 2020; Noschese 2011; O'Connor, Jung, and Reeves 2018; Wilcox 2011). However, many myths and barriers accompanying these alternative science grading practices can make shifting toward standard-based grading (SBG) difficult. The purpose of this article is to address these myths and provide strategies for effectively implementing SBG in the science classroom.
National Science Teaching Association. 1840 Wilson Boulevard, Arlington, VA 22201-3000. Tel: 800-722-6782; Fax: 703-243-3924; e-mail: membership@nsta.org; Web site: https://www.nsta.org/
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Secondary Education; High Schools
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A