Descriptor
| College Science | 2 |
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Science Departments | 2 |
| Chemistry | 1 |
| College Faculty | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Data Interpretation | 1 |
| Employed Women | 1 |
| Employment Opportunities | 1 |
| Faculty | 1 |
| Faculty Publishing | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Science | 2 |
Author
| Broad, William J. | 1 |
| Cherfas, Jeremy | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 1 |
Location
| United Kingdom | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedCherfas, Jeremy – Science, 1990
Argues about the conclusion that bigger science departments are more productive than smaller ones. Indicates the conclusion cannot be supported by the data. (YP)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Science, Data Interpretation, Faculty
Peer reviewedBroad, William J. – Science, 1980
The controversy surrounding the sex discrimination suit, brought seven years ago by a University of Minnesota chemist, is discussed as it relates to the current court decision in which the plaintiff was awarded $100,000.00. (Author/SA)
Descriptors: Chemistry, College Science, Court Litigation, Employed Women
