Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Meta Analysis | 3 |
Peer Evaluation | 3 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Age Differences | 1 |
College Faculty | 1 |
College Students | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
Criteria | 1 |
Educational Practices | 1 |
Educational Research | 1 |
Effect Size | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Review of Educational Research | 3 |
Author
Bornmann, Lutz | 1 |
Bowers, Peter N. | 1 |
Daniel, Hans-Dieter | 1 |
Deacon, S. Helene | 1 |
Falchikov, Nancy | 1 |
Goldfinch, Judy | 1 |
Kirby, John R. | 1 |
Marsh, Herbert W. | 1 |
Mutz, Rudiger | 1 |
O'Mara, Alison | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Elementary Education | 1 |
Grade 1 | 1 |
Grade 2 | 1 |
Grade 3 | 1 |
Grade 4 | 1 |
Grade 5 | 1 |
Grade 6 | 1 |
Grade 7 | 1 |
Grade 8 | 1 |
Higher Education | 1 |
Preschool Education | 1 |
More ▼ |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Bowers, Peter N.; Kirby, John R.; Deacon, S. Helene – Review of Educational Research, 2010
The authors reviewed all peer-reviewed studies with participants from preschool to Grade 8 for this meta-analysis of morphological interventions. They identified 22 applicable studies. Instructional effects (Cohen's d) were averaged by linguistic outcome categories (morphological sublexical, non-morphological sublexical, lexical, and supralexical)…
Descriptors: Morphology (Languages), Literacy, Meta Analysis, Peer Evaluation
Marsh, Herbert W.; Bornmann, Lutz; Mutz, Rudiger; Daniel, Hans-Dieter; O'Mara, Alison – Review of Educational Research, 2009
Peer review is valued in higher education, but also widely criticized in terms of potential biases, particularly gender. We evaluate gender differences in peer reviews of grant applications, extending Bornmann, Mutz, and Daniel's meta-analyses that reported small gender differences in favor of men (d = 0.04), but a substantial heterogeneity in…
Descriptors: Effect Size, Gender Differences, Grants, Peer Evaluation

Falchikov, Nancy; Goldfinch, Judy – Review of Educational Research, 2000
Subjected 48 quantitative peer assessment studies that compared peer and teacher marks to meta-analysis. Peer assessments were found to resemble teacher assessments more closely when global judgments based on well understood criteria were used rather than when marking involved assessing several individual dimensions. (Author/SLD)
Descriptors: College Faculty, College Students, Comparative Analysis, Criteria