Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 3 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 3 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 5 |
Descriptor
Journal Articles | 5 |
Synthesis | 5 |
Evidence | 3 |
Literature Reviews | 3 |
Databases | 2 |
Online Searching | 2 |
Access to Information | 1 |
Accuracy | 1 |
Attitudes | 1 |
Automation | 1 |
COVID-19 | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Synthesis Methods | 5 |
Author
Andrea Tricco | 1 |
Aromataris, Edoardo | 1 |
Ashrita Saran | 1 |
Barker, Timothy H. | 1 |
Bonell, Chris | 1 |
Catrin Evans | 1 |
Christina M. Godfrey | 1 |
Daniel Ameen | 1 |
Danielle Pollock | 1 |
Dawid Pieper | 1 |
Erica B. Moraes | 1 |
More ▼ |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 5 |
Reports - Research | 3 |
Information Analyses | 2 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Barker, Timothy H.; Pollock, Danielle; Stone, Jennifer C.; Klugar, Miloslav; Scott, Anna M.; Stern, Cindy; Wiechula, Rick; Shamseer, Larissa; Aromataris, Edoardo; Ross-White, Amanda; Munn, Zachary – Research Synthesis Methods, 2023
Synthesizers of evidence are increasingly likely to encounter studies published in predatory journals during the evidence synthesis process. The evidence synthesis discipline is uniquely positioned to encounter novel concerns associated with predatory journals. The objective of this research was to explore the attitudes, opinions, and experiences…
Descriptors: Journal Articles, Periodicals, Evidence, Synthesis
Hanan Khalil; Danielle Pollock; Patricia McInerney; Catrin Evans; Erica B. Moraes; Christina M. Godfrey; Lyndsay Alexander; Andrea Tricco; Micah D. J. Peters; Dawid Pieper; Ashrita Saran; Daniel Ameen; Petek Eylul Taneri; Zachary Munn – Research Synthesis Methods, 2024
Objective: This paper describes several automation tools and software that can be considered during evidence synthesis projects and provides guidance for their integration in the conduct of scoping reviews. Study Design and Setting: The guidance presented in this work is adapted from the results of a scoping review and consultations with the JBI…
Descriptors: Automation, Computer Software, Synthesis, Protocol Analysis
Metzendorf, Maria-Inti; Featherstone, Robin M. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2021
The Cochrane COVID-19 Study Register (CCSR) is a public, continually updated database of COVID-19 study references. The aim of this study-based register is to support rapid and living evidence synthesis, including an evidence ecosystem of COVID-19 research (CEOsys). In November and December 2020, we conducted an evaluation of the CCSR for CEOsys,…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Databases, Accuracy
Melendez-Torres, G. J.; Grant, Sean; Bonell, Chris – Research Synthesis Methods, 2015
Introduction: Reciprocal translation, the understanding of one study's findings in terms of another's, is the foundation of most qualitative metasynthetic methods. In light of the proliferation of metasynthesis methods, the current review sought to create a taxonomy of operations of reciprocal translation using recently published qualitative…
Descriptors: Qualitative Research, Synthesis, Public Health, Taxonomy
Pham, Mai T.; Rajic, Andrijana; Greig, Judy D.; Sargeant, Jan M.; Papadopoulos, Andrew; McEwen, Scott A. – Research Synthesis Methods, 2014
Background: The scoping review has become an increasingly popular approach for synthesizing research evidence. It is a relatively new approach for which a universal study definition or definitive procedure has not been established. The purpose of this scoping review was to provide an overview of scoping reviews in the literature. Methods: A…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Synthesis, Evidence, Literature Reviews