NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Thompson Coon, Jo; Gwernan-Jones, Ruth; Garside, Ruth; Nunns, Michael; Shaw, Liz; Melendez-Torres, G. J.; Moore, Darren – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
The incorporation of evidence derived from multiple research designs into one single synthesis can enhance the utility of systematic reviews making them more worthwhile, useful, and insightful. Methodological guidance for mixed-methods synthesis continues to emerge and evolve but broadly involves a sequential, parallel, or convergent approach…
Descriptors: Evidence, Medical Research, Mixed Methods Research, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Brunton, Ginny; Webbe, James; Oliver, Sandy; Gale, Chris – Research Synthesis Methods, 2020
Trials evaluating the same interventions rarely measure or report identical outcomes. This limits the possibility of aggregating effect sizes across studies to generate high-quality evidence through systematic reviews and meta-analyses. To address this problem, core outcome sets (COS) establish agreed sets of outcomes to be used in all future…
Descriptors: Intervention, Outcome Measures, Effect Size, Qualitative Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Schmitz, Tom; Bukowski, Mark; Koschmieder, Steffen; Schmitz-Rode, Thomas; Farkas, Robert – Research Synthesis Methods, 2019
Launching biomedical innovations based on clinical demands instead of translating basic research findings to practice reduces the risk that the results will not fit the clinical routine. To realize this type of innovation, a meta-analysis of the body of research is necessary to reveal demand-matching concepts. However, both the data deluge and the…
Descriptors: Innovation, Biomedicine, Medical Research, Meta Analysis