Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 1 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 2 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Experimenter Characteristics | 2 |
Grants | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Peer Evaluation | 2 |
Researchers | 2 |
Selection Criteria | 2 |
Bias | 1 |
Biomedicine | 1 |
Content Analysis | 1 |
Decision Making | 1 |
Eligibility | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Research Evaluation | 2 |
Author
Carrion, Carme | 1 |
Ferreira-González, Ignacio | 1 |
Guillamón, Imma | 1 |
João M. Santos | 1 |
Permanyer-Miralda, Gaietà | 1 |
Pons, Joan M. V. | 1 |
Ribera, Aida | 1 |
Solans-Domènech, Maite | 1 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 2 |
Reports - Research | 2 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
João M. Santos – Research Evaluation, 2024
The allocation of scientific funding through grant programs is crucial for research advancement. While independent peer panels typically handle evaluations, their decisions can lean on personal preferences that go beyond the stated criteria, leading to inconsistencies and potential biases. Given these concerns, our study employs a novel method,…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Funding Formulas, Scientific Research
Solans-Domènech, Maite; Guillamón, Imma; Ribera, Aida; Ferreira-González, Ignacio; Carrion, Carme; Permanyer-Miralda, Gaietà; Pons, Joan M. V. – Research Evaluation, 2017
To blind or not researcher's identity has often been a topic of debate in the context of peer-review process for scientific publication and research grant application. This article reports on how knowing the name and experience of researchers/institutions influences the qualification of a proposal. We present our experience of managing the…
Descriptors: Biomedicine, Medical Research, Grantsmanship, Grants