Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 1 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Bias | 1 |
| Decision Making | 1 |
| Evaluation Criteria | 1 |
| Experimenter Characteristics | 1 |
| Funding Formulas | 1 |
| Grants | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Interrater Reliability | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Preferences | 1 |
| Program Proposals | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Evaluation | 1 |
Author
| João M. Santos | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkJoão M. Santos – Research Evaluation, 2024
The allocation of scientific funding through grant programs is crucial for research advancement. While independent peer panels typically handle evaluations, their decisions can lean on personal preferences that go beyond the stated criteria, leading to inconsistencies and potential biases. Given these concerns, our study employs a novel method,…
Descriptors: Grants, Program Proposals, Funding Formulas, Scientific Research
