NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Research Ethics70
Audience
Researchers3
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 46 to 60 of 70 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Paruzel-Czachura, Mariola; Baran, Lidia; Spendel, Zbigniew – Research Ethics, 2021
The paper reports two studies exploring the relationship between scholars' self-reported publication pressure and their self-reported scientific misconduct in research. In Study 1 the participants (N = 423) were scholars representing various disciplines from one big university in Poland. In Study 2 the participants (N = 31) were exclusively…
Descriptors: Publish or Perish Issue, College Faculty, College Administration, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Giulia Inguaggiato; Claudia Pallise Perello; Petra Verdonk; Linda Schoonmade; Pamela Andanda; Mariette van den Hoven; Natalie Evans – Research Ethics, 2024
Responses to the COVID-19 pandemic globally disrupted lives and contributed to the exacerbation of pre-existing inequalities. Women in research were also affected. The prominent role that women played in professional and personal care duties had a detrimental effect on their research outputs, potentially hindering their career progression.…
Descriptors: Experience, Females, Researchers, COVID-19
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Chua, Shi Min – Research Ethics, 2022
Internet users' comments in online spaces have attracted researchers' attention in recent years. Although this data is typically publicly available, its use requires careful consideration so as to not cause harm to the users, while complying with the terms and conditions (Ts & Cs) of the online spaces. However, the Ts & Cs and researchers'…
Descriptors: Ethics, Researchers, Internet, Computer Mediated Communication
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hofmann, Bjørn; Holm, Søren – Research Ethics, 2019
Background: Research integrity has gained attention in the general public as well as in the research community. We wanted to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices amongst researchers that have recently finished their PhD and compare this to their responses during their PhD fellowship. In particular, we wanted to investigate whether their…
Descriptors: Integrity, Foreign Countries, Researchers, Doctoral Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Dove, Edward S.; Douglas, Cristina – Research Ethics, 2023
While ethical norms for conducting academic research in the United Kingdom are relatively clear, there is little empirical understanding of how university research ethics committees (RECs) themselves operate and whether they are seen to operate well. In this article, we offer insights from a project focused on the Scottish university context. We…
Descriptors: Ethics, Universities, Foreign Countries, Administrator Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Datta, Ranjan – Research Ethics, 2018
How does one decolonize and reclaim the meanings of research and researcher, particularly in the context of Western research? Indigenous communities have long experienced oppression by Western researchers. Is it possible to build a collaborative research knowledge that is culturally appropriate, respectful, honoring, and careful of the Indigenous…
Descriptors: Researchers, Research Methodology, Indigenous Populations, Social Bias
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bruton, Samuel V.; Sacco, Donald F. – Research Ethics, 2018
Disclosure has become the preferred way of addressing the threat to researcher objectivity arising from financial conflicts of interest (FCOIs). This article argues that the effectiveness of disclosure at protecting science from the corrupting effects of FCOIs--particularly the kind of disclosure mandated by US federal granting agencies--is more…
Descriptors: Disclosure, Conflict of Interest, Researchers, Financial Support
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nalubega, Sylivia; Cox, Karen; Mugerwa, Henry; Evans, Catrin – Research Ethics, 2021
There is a gap in evidence regarding how research trial closure processes are managed to ensure continuity of HIV care for HIV positive participants following trial closure within low income settings. This research aimed to establish how research staff in Uganda understood and practised post-trial care for HIV positive trial participants. A…
Descriptors: Ethics, Medical Research, Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS), Drug Therapy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kerasidou, Angeliki – Research Ethics, 2017
The role of ethics committees is to protect and safeguard the rights and welfare of participants, and promote good research by providing ethical guidance to researchers. In order for ethics committees to fulfil their role and obligations, they need to have adequate understanding of the science and scientific methods used in research. Genomics is a…
Descriptors: Ethics, Committees, Research Methodology, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Machin, Helen E.; Shardlow, Steven M. – Research Ethics, 2018
Researchers engaged in studies about 'hidden social groups' are likely to face several ethical challenges. Using a study with undocumented Chinese migrants in the UK, challenges involved in obtaining approval by a university research ethics committee are explored. General guidance about how to resolve potential research ethics issues, with…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Research Methodology, Social Science Research, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gelfand, Scott D. – Research Ethics, 2019
In this essay, I suggest that a slightly modified version of Freedman's formulation of the clinical equipoise requirement is justified. I begin this essay with a brief discussion of the equipoise requirement. In the second and third sections, I discuss several objections to the clinical equipoise requirement as well as two attempts to justify the…
Descriptors: Ethics, Medical Research, Physician Patient Relationship, Parent Child Relationship
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tolich, Martin; Marlowe, Jay – Research Ethics, 2017
A previous research ethics article by the authors provided evidence to support the claim that the New Zealand Ethics Committee (NZEC) was a powerless ethics committee. Ethics review applicants were not formally obliged to seek ethics review, and any committee recommendations were given on a 'take it or leave it' basis. One year later, the capacity…
Descriptors: Power Structure, Ethics, Research Committees, Research Administration
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mahoney, Ian; Kearon, Tony – Research Ethics, 2018
This case study article draws upon experiences of a doctoral student (Mahoney) and supervisor (Kearon) to reflect on the way in which we construct ethical narratives around our research. We seek to draw attention to the manner in which strict adherence to ERB guidelines can be problematic and risks causing more harm than it seeks to mitigate. We…
Descriptors: Student Research, Criminology, Graduate Students, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Ralefala, Dimpho; Ali, Joseph; Kass, Nancy; Hyder, Adnan – Research Ethics, 2018
Most countries, including Botswana, have established Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) to provide oversight of research involving human beings. Although much has been published on the structure and function of IRBs around the world, there is less literature that empirically describes the perspectives of stakeholders in low- and middle-income…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Knowledge Level, Ethics, Foreign Countries
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Walby, Kevin; Luscombe, Alex – Research Ethics, 2018
Freedom of information (FOI) requests are increasingly used in sociology, criminology and other social science disciplines to examine government practices and processes. University ethical review boards (ERBs) in Canada have not typically subjected researchers' FOI requests to independent review, although this may be changing in the United Kingdom…
Descriptors: Ethics, Qualitative Research, Access to Information, Freedom
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5