NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Carniel, Jessica; Hickey, Andrew; Southey, Kim; Brömdal, Annette; Crowley-Cyr, Lynda; Eacersall, Douglas; Farmer, Will; Gehrmann, Richard; Machin, Tanya; Pillay, Yosheen – Research Ethics, 2023
Ethics review processes are frequently perceived as extending from codes and protocols rooted in biomedical disciplines. As a result, many researchers in the humanities and social sciences (HASS) find these processes to be misaligned, if not outrightly obstructive to their research. This leads some scholars to advocate against HASS participation…
Descriptors: Ethics, Humanities, Social Sciences, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hofmann, Bjørn; Holm, Søren – Research Ethics, 2019
Background: Research integrity has gained attention in the general public as well as in the research community. We wanted to investigate knowledge, attitudes, and practices amongst researchers that have recently finished their PhD and compare this to their responses during their PhD fellowship. In particular, we wanted to investigate whether their…
Descriptors: Integrity, Foreign Countries, Researchers, Doctoral Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Redman, Barbara K.; Caplan, Arthur L. – Research Ethics, 2015
The proportion of research misconduct cases among trainees in the biomedical sciences has risen, raising the question of why, and what are the responsibilities of research administrators and the research community to address this problem. Although there is no definitive research about causes, for trainees the relationship with a research mentor…
Descriptors: Ethics, Biomedicine, Researchers, Administrator Role