Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Biomedicine | 1 |
| Committees | 1 |
| Ethics | 1 |
| Evaluation | 1 |
| Evaluators | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Humanities | 1 |
| Intellectual Disciplines | 1 |
| Research | 1 |
| Researchers | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Research Ethics | 1 |
Author
| Brömdal, Annette | 1 |
| Carniel, Jessica | 1 |
| Crowley-Cyr, Lynda | 1 |
| Eacersall, Douglas | 1 |
| Farmer, Will | 1 |
| Gehrmann, Richard | 1 |
| Hickey, Andrew | 1 |
| Machin, Tanya | 1 |
| Pillay, Yosheen | 1 |
| Southey, Kim | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkCarniel, Jessica; Hickey, Andrew; Southey, Kim; Brömdal, Annette; Crowley-Cyr, Lynda; Eacersall, Douglas; Farmer, Will; Gehrmann, Richard; Machin, Tanya; Pillay, Yosheen – Research Ethics, 2023
Ethics review processes are frequently perceived as extending from codes and protocols rooted in biomedical disciplines. As a result, many researchers in the humanities and social sciences (HASS) find these processes to be misaligned, if not outrightly obstructive to their research. This leads some scholars to advocate against HASS participation…
Descriptors: Ethics, Humanities, Social Sciences, Research
