NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20250
Since 20240
Since 2021 (last 5 years)0
Since 2016 (last 10 years)13
Since 2006 (last 20 years)24
Source
Reading Improvement59
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards1
Showing 46 to 59 of 59 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Perry, Adrienne – Reading Improvement, 2000
Considers how the topic of accountability and high-stakes testing has become more critical given the heightened visibility and importance of tests and test results. Notes that trends indicate that scrutiny of public schools and assessment will increase and that students need and deserve to have the best information available regarding effective…
Descriptors: Accountability, Curriculum Design, Elementary Secondary Education, High Stakes Tests
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Heerman, Charles E.; Seltzer, Kathryn N. – Reading Improvement, 1983
Concludes that the Nelson-Denny Reading Test (NDRT) provides valid predictions of student academic aptitude and is a reliable measure of reading attitude. Finds no significant correlation between the NDRT and student self-concept. (FL)
Descriptors: Academic Aptitude, Predictive Validity, Reading Achievement, Reading Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rust, James O.; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1982
Concludes that the Slingerland Screening Tests were reliable and useful in locating primary school children who were experiencing reading difficulties and were in need of individual attention. (FL)
Descriptors: Auditory Perception, Primary Education, Reading Difficulties, Reading Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Klecker, Beverly M. – Reading Improvement, 2006
This paper presents a secondary analysis of the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) dataset. The study explores differences in the NAEP fourth, eighth, and twelfth grade reading scores by students' gender across the years 1992, 1994, 1998, 2000, 2002, and 2003. The study used the NAEP National Public School data. The statistically…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Grade 4, Grade 8, Grade 12
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ahrendt, Kenneth M. – Reading Improvement, 1971
Descriptors: Adult Reading Programs, Attendance, Homework, Program Descriptions
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rogers, C. D. – Reading Improvement, 1980
Analyzes eight variables in diagnostic tests to determine which are the most predictive of reading levels and then discusses how much each variable adds to this prediction and whether the answers are equally applicable to grades three, six, and nine. (FL)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Factor Analysis, Phonics, Predictor Variables
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Sabaroff, Rose E.; Frary, Robert B. – Reading Improvement, 1978
Shows how third graders' error patterns on a reading test related to their cognitive styles. Suggests corrective teaching strategies to follow such categorization and analysis. (RL)
Descriptors: Cognitive Style, Diagnostic Teaching, Elementary Education, Error Analysis (Language)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Tunnell, Michael O.; And Others – Reading Improvement, 1988
Reports on a study to develop and test a short form reading attitude survey which could be readily used by classroom teachers. Results showed that most students hold favorable attitudes toward reading, and that the survey is reliable, quick, and simple to use. (RAE)
Descriptors: Affective Objectives, Cognitive Ability, Elementary Education, Grade 2
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Smith, Lawrence L. – Reading Improvement, 1980
Compares seven reading expectancy formulae after converting each to stanines to determine whether the more stabilized formulae would produce similar decisions as to whether a student should be referred for further diagnosis. (FL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Education, Expectation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Krawiec, Rosalind M.; Spadafore, Gerald J. – Reading Improvement, 1983
Concludes that grade level scores on the Brigance Diagnostic Inventory of Basic Skills are consistent with those of the Wide Range Achievement Test. (FL)
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Basic Skills, Comparative Analysis, Elementary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Klecker, Beverly M.; Pollock, Mary Anne – Reading Improvement, 2005
Kentucky's goal of reaching academic "proficiency" by 2014 illuminated 2002 reading test scores: 44.30% of middle and 71.25% of high school students scored below "proficient." The research question was, "Do teaching practices in schools with high reading achievement scores differ from teaching practices in schools with low…
Descriptors: Reading Tests, Reading Achievement, Teacher Surveys, Grade 9
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bieger, Elaine M. – Reading Improvement, 1989
Evaluates whether the "Degrees of Reading Power" reading achievement test (1) is a testing and teaching tool; (2) is a valid reading assessment; (3) should be used for third grade; and (4) correlates with other reading tests. Questions whether the test's Readability Report information really reflects test scores. (SR)
Descriptors: Achievement Tests, Criterion Referenced Tests, Diagnostic Tests, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Elijah, David; Legenza, Alice – Reading Improvement, 1980
Reports correlations between scores on the Metropolitan Readiness Tests, teacher rankings of reading readiness, and socioeconomic (SES) status of 536 beginning first-grade pupils. Discusses results in terms of the effects SES may have on both a student's readiness scores and a teacher's view of student readiness. (FL)
Descriptors: Primary Education, Reading Improvement, Reading Instruction, Reading Readiness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Collins, Cathy – Reading Improvement, 1979
Reports on a study that examined the predictive power of five specific prereading skills tests for first-grade reading achievement and assessed their value as indicators of reading readiness. (FL)
Descriptors: Beginning Reading, Criterion Referenced Tests, Grade 1, Predictive Validity
« Previous Page | Next Page
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4