Descriptor
| Comparative Testing | 2 |
| Testing | 2 |
| Ethnic Groups | 1 |
| Intelligence Tests | 1 |
| Preschool Children | 1 |
| Psychological Testing | 1 |
| Statistical Analysis | 1 |
| Task Performance | 1 |
| Test Reliability | 1 |
| Test Validity | 1 |
Source
| Psychology in the Schools | 2 |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Illinois Test of… | 1 |
| Wechsler Intelligence Scale… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedPielstick, N. L.; Thorndike, Robert M. – Psychology in the Schools, 1976
Reanalysis of Wakefield and Carlson's data confirmed canonical correlations of .84 and .69, but analysis of redundancies revealed that only 34 percent of the total WISC subtest variance is redundant with the ITPA and 39 percent of the ITPA subtest variance is redundant with the WISC. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Intelligence Tests, Statistical Analysis, Test Reliability
Peer reviewedAdams, Jerry; Lieb, Jack J. – Psychology in the Schools, 1973
The Canter-BIP (Background Interfence Procedure) represents an instrument free of many effects found to add to error variance in the application of other instruments. It is essentially free of sex, intelligence level, emotional status and maturational effects, and, at least for young children, is essentially free of ethnic group effects. (Author)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Ethnic Groups, Preschool Children, Psychological Testing
