Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 2 |
Descriptor
Campuses | 2 |
Educational Facilities… | 2 |
Higher Education | 2 |
Horticulture | 2 |
Preservation | 2 |
Sustainability | 2 |
American Indians | 1 |
College Administration | 1 |
College Environment | 1 |
College Planning | 1 |
Comparative Analysis | 1 |
More ▼ |
Source
Planning for Higher Education | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Opinion Papers | 1 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Higher Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Kansas | 3 |
California | 1 |
Georgia | 1 |
Iowa | 1 |
Vermont | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Martin, Frank Edgerton – Planning for Higher Education, 2011
Several of the campus heritage plans funded by the Getty Foundation served as laboratories for applying the relatively new field of cultural landscape preservation to campus planning. With a strong landscape component, the heritage plans of The University of Kansas, Cranbrook Academy, the University of California, Berkeley, and elsewhere remind…
Descriptors: Higher Education, Campuses, Educational Facilities Planning, College Environment
Bruce, Jeffrey L. – Planning for Higher Education, 2011
As American settlement spread to the Midwest, college and university campuses came to symbolize some of the greatest achievements of public policy and private philanthropy. However, the expansion westward often ignored the cultural precedents of Native Americans and the diversity of the varied native landscapes. Today, campus planners and historic…
Descriptors: United States History, Educational History, Educational Facilities Planning, Public Policy

Teeter, Deborah J.; Christal, Melodie E. – Planning for Higher Education, 1987
Administrators want a set of "peer" institutions for planning, resource allocation, and performance measurement purposes. The methodologies developed and used by NCHEMS and by the State of Kansas for selecting peer institutions are compared and contrasted. Criteria for comparison are appended. (MLW)
Descriptors: College Administration, College Planning, Comparative Analysis, Evaluation Criteria