Publication Date
In 2025 | 0 |
Since 2024 | 0 |
Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
Source
Phi Delta Kappan | 4 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 4 |
Reports - Evaluative | 4 |
Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Adult Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Chile | 1 |
Mexico | 1 |
Singapore | 1 |
Sweden | 1 |
United Kingdom (England) | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Sclafani, Susan – Phi Delta Kappan, 2010
Nations around the world are experimenting with ways to use salary incentives to recruit and retain teachers, fill vacancies in hard-to-staff areas, and improve student learning. These experiments come at a time when qualified teachers are in short supply and when teaching appears to be a less popular professional choice for young people. Programs…
Descriptors: Incentives, Foreign Countries, Teacher Salaries, Compensation (Remuneration)
Bracey, Gerald W. – Phi Delta Kappan, 1999
A Hudson Institute study claims school administration is top-heavy. Actually, U.S. teachers constitute 78% of the instructional staff, which includes principals, assistant principals, librarians, and counselors. A 1998 OECD report shows that some nations have surpassed the U.S. graduation rate. The U.S. spends the most on higher education. (MLH)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Comparative Education, Costs, Elementary Secondary Education
Raths, James – Phi Delta Kappan, 1994
Michael Kirst's article "Strengths and Weaknesses of American Education" in the April 1993 "Kappan" applauds U.S. efforts to become globally competitive. However, assembling cars in Mexico or exporting jobs to Korea blurs the distinction between national/corporate "teams." The issue is not talent but cheap talent.…
Descriptors: Comparative Education, Competition, Education Work Relationship, Industry
Bracey, Gerald W. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2000
Describes United States literacy characteristics, based on April 2000 reports from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development and the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Discusses Angoff methods for evaluating validity of high-stakes testing programs in Massachusetts and Virginia. (MLH)
Descriptors: Comparative Education, Education Work Relationship, Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods