Descriptor
| Phonics | 2 |
| Reading Instruction | 2 |
| Criticism | 1 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Meta Analysis | 1 |
| Program Evaluation | 1 |
| Reading Research | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Research Methodology | 1 |
| Research Problems | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Phi Delta Kappan | 2 |
Author
| Garan, Elaine M. | 2 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Garan, Elaine M. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2001
Author makes a point-by-point rebuttal to Ehri and Stahl's criticism of her critical analysis of the National Reading Panel report on the effectiveness of phonics instruction in helping children to read. (PKP)
Descriptors: Criticism, Elementary Secondary Education, Phonics, Reading Instruction
Garan, Elaine M. – Phi Delta Kappan, 2001
The National Reading Panel admits its evaluation report on phonics is seriously flawed as to organization, methodology, appropriateness of research base, generalizability of results, reliability, validity, and accuracy of data reported. However, an influential public-relations machine is promoting the study's favorable results as unvarnished…
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Meta Analysis, Phonics, Program Evaluation
